Evaluation of the own body in women with current and remitted borderline personality disorder: evidence for long-lasting effects of childhood sexual abuse. Issue 1 (31st December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kleindienst, Nikolaus; Löffler, Annette; Herzig, Madeleine; Bertsch, Katja; Bekrater-Bodmann, Robin
• Is Part Of: European journal of psychotraumatology. Volume 11:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-31
• Subjects: Adverse childhood experiences -- body image -- borderline personality disorder -- childhood sexual abuse -- remission -- trauma; Experiencias adversas tempranas -- imagen corporal -- trastorno de la personalidad límite -- abuso sexual infantil -- remisión -- trauma; 不良童年经历 -- 身体形象 -- 边缘性人格障碍 -- 童年期性虐待 -- 缓解 -- 创伤; Women with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) showed a negative evaluation of the own body. In contrast, women who have remitted from BPD showed a generally positive body evaluation. However, their positive evaluations were strictly confined to areas without sexual connotation; sexually connoted body areas were rated as highly negative. The negative evaluation of sexually connoted body areas in women who had remitted from BPD was moderated by childhood sexual abuse.; Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Periodicals; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1764707
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-8198

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Evaluation of one's own body highly depends on psychopathology. In contrast to healthy women, body evaluation is negative in women from several diagnostic groups. Particularly negative ratings have been reported in disorders related to childhood sexual abuse (CSA) including borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, it is unknown whether this negative evaluation persists beyond symptomatic remission, whether it depends on the topography of body areas (sexually connoted versus neutral areas), and whether it depends on CSA. Objective: First, we aimed at a quantitative comparison of body evaluation across three diagnostic groups: current BPD (cBPD), remitted BPD (rBPD), and healthy controls (HC). Second, we aimed at clarifying the potentially moderating role of a history of CSA and of the sexual connotation of body areas. Methods: The study included 68 women from the diagnostic groups of interest (cBPD, rBPD, and HC). These diagnoses were established with the International Personality Disorder Examination. The participants used the Survey of Body Areas to quantify the evaluation of the own body and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire for assessing CSA. Results: While the evaluation of the own body was generally negative in women from the cBPD group it was positive in those who had remitted from BPD. However, their positive scores were strictly confined to neutral body areas, whereas the evaluation of sexually connoted body areas was negative, resembling the respective evaluation in cBPD patients and contrasting the positive evaluation of sexually connoted areas in healthy women. The negative evaluation of sexually connoted areas in remitted women was significantly related to a history of CSA. Conclusions: Women with BPD may require a specifically designed intervention to achieve a positive evaluation of their entire body. The evaluation of sexually connoted body areas seems to remain an issue even after remission from the disorder has been achieved.