Trust and performance in business teams: a meta-analysis. Issue 5 (15th July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Trust and performance in business teams: a meta-analysis. Issue 5 (15th July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Trust and performance in business teams: a meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Morrissette, Amy M.
Kisamore, Jennifer L. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the nature of the relationship between team trust and team performance in the business context is determined. Second, both team design (team size and team type) and methodological moderators (source of criterion measure and study date) of the relationship are assessed. Design/methodology/approach: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on published and unpublished empirical studies. Subgroup moderator analyses were conducted using Cochran's Q. Continuous moderator analyses were conducted using meta-regression. Findings: Data from 55 independent studies (3, 671 teams) were pooled. Results indicated a large, positive relationship between team trust and team performance in real business teams. Further analyses indicated that the relationship was significantly moderated by business team type, team size and source of criterion measure. Research limitations/implications: Results indicate that different team types, sizes and performance criteria should not be treated as equivalent. Results are based on cross-sectional research and can only be generalized to business teams. Practical implications: Managers should be attentive to trust issues in work teams, as they may portend future performance problems or mirror other organizational issues that affect team performance. Team function and size predict how team trust is related to team performance. Originality/value: The present study answers a call by Costa etAbstract : Purpose: The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the nature of the relationship between team trust and team performance in the business context is determined. Second, both team design (team size and team type) and methodological moderators (source of criterion measure and study date) of the relationship are assessed. Design/methodology/approach: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on published and unpublished empirical studies. Subgroup moderator analyses were conducted using Cochran's Q. Continuous moderator analyses were conducted using meta-regression. Findings: Data from 55 independent studies (3, 671 teams) were pooled. Results indicated a large, positive relationship between team trust and team performance in real business teams. Further analyses indicated that the relationship was significantly moderated by business team type, team size and source of criterion measure. Research limitations/implications: Results indicate that different team types, sizes and performance criteria should not be treated as equivalent. Results are based on cross-sectional research and can only be generalized to business teams. Practical implications: Managers should be attentive to trust issues in work teams, as they may portend future performance problems or mirror other organizational issues that affect team performance. Team function and size predict how team trust is related to team performance. Originality/value: The present study answers a call by Costa et al. (2018) for additional investigation of moderators of the trust-performance relationship in teams using a quantitative review of studies. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Team performance management. Volume 26:Issue 5/6(2020)
- Journal:
- Team performance management
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 5/6(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 5/6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 5/6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0026-NaN-0000
- Page Start:
- 287
- Page End:
- 300
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-15
- Subjects:
- Trust -- Meta-analysis -- Teams -- Team management -- Performance -- Business teams -- Team trust -- Team performance -- Team size -- Team type -- Team function -- Criterion source
Teams in the workplace -- Periodicals
Employee empowerment -- Periodicals
Management -- Employee participation -- Periodicals
658.402 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1352-7592 ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/TPM-02-2020-0012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1352-7592
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8614.560200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22217.xml