Attitudes and Practices. Issue 3 (3rd July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pettigrove, Glen
• Is Part Of: Australasian philosophical review. Volume 3:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 288
• Page End: 304
• Publication Date: 2019-07-03
• Subjects: fitting attitudes -- forgiveness -- moral repair -- practices -- reactive attitudes -- retaliation -- Fricker -- Rawls -- Strawson -- Tuomela; Philosophy -- Periodicals; 101
• DOI: 10.1080/24740500.2020.1859233
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2474-0500

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The philosophical literature on forgiveness has ignored a distinction that has a profound bearing on when we should forgive, namely, the distinction between attitudes and practices. Most of the literature focuses on the attitudes called for in the aftermath of wrongdoing. And it attempts to derive the ethics of forgiving directly from the ethical profile of those attitudes. However, attitudes underdetermine what one ought to do. I argue that assessing what we should do also requires us to consider practices. Although I focus on forgiveness, the argument generalizes to other areas. Taking the distinction between attitudes and practices seriously will change the way we approach not only the question, 'When should one forgive?' but also, for example, 'When should one be grateful?' 'When should one blame?' 'When should one honour?' or any other activity that includes an attitude as a defining feature.