Unpacking the black box of systemic risks in banking: How causal loop modeling helps overcome rigid risk sharing and categorization. Issue 6 (24th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hoffmann, Christian Hugo
• Is Part Of: Kybernetes. Volume 49:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1675
• Page End: 1690
• Publication Date: 2019-09-24
• Subjects: Causality -- Systemic thinking -- Risk management -- Feedback -- System dynamics -- Risk sharing -- Global financial crisis -- Systemic risks -- Explanatory modeling; Cybernetics -- Periodicals; Systems engineering -- Periodicals; 003.505
• DOI: 10.1108/K-05-2019-0314
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0368-492X

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Systemic risks affect financial market participants in many ways. However, the literature insists firmly that they are and, in fact, should be of little concern to (private) banks (as opposed to regulators). The purpose of this paper is to argue for the relevance of systemic risks for private banks as opposed to regulators only by making use of causal loop models as being traditionally used in the discipline of systems dynamics. In contrast to the starting point for all common risk-management frameworks in banks, which is the classification of risks into risk categories, the authors show that risk has been compartmentalized too much and provide a strong case for a really holistic approach. Design/methodology/approach: Systems thinking, causal loop models and conceptual approach. Findings: Relevance of systemic risks for private banks as opposed to regulators only. In contrast to the starting point for all common risk-management frameworks in banks, which is the classification of risks into risk categories, the authors show that risk has been compartmentalized too much and provide a strong case for a really holistic approach, which stems from using explanatory models such as causal loop diagrams. On top of that more explanatory models ought to be used for risk management purposes while banks currently rely too much on statistical-descriptive approaches. Originality/value: Integration of systems thinking into risk management, which is novel: in contrast to the starting point for all common risk-management frameworks in banks, which is the classification of risks into risk categories, the authors show that risk has been compartmentalized too much and provide a strong case for a really holistic approach.