Investment considerations and impressions of integrated reporting: Evidence from Taiwan. Issue 1 (8th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hsiao, Pei-Chi Kelly; Kelly, Martin
• Is Part Of: Sustainability accounting, management and policy journal. Volume 9:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 2
• Page End: 28
• Publication Date: 2017-12-08
• Subjects: Taiwan -- Investors -- Integrated reporting -- Investment decision-making; Social accounting -- Periodicals; Sustainable development reporting -- Periodicals; Social responsibility of business -- Periodicals; Industries -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 658.40805
• DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2016-0072
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2040-8021

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Integrated reporting (IR) aims to improve the quality of information available to capital providers. While IR is associated with decreases in investor uncertainty and increases in firm value, it is unclear how IR information directly influences investment decisions. This paper aims to investigate the investment considerations of Taiwanese investors and their initial impressions of the International Integrated Reporting Framework (IIRC Framework). In doing so, this study examines the relationships between investment considerations and the IIRC Framework's concepts. Design/methodology/approach: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 16 investors in Taiwan. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data collected. Findings: In addition to economic and financial outlook, competitive advantages and ownership structure, Taiwanese investors emphasise management credibility as an important factor that influences investment decisions. Investors are reliant on private information sources and quantitative data. Sustainability disclosures and sustainability performance beyond legal requirements are often not considered. Taiwanese investors lack awareness of the IIRC Framework and are sceptical about the premise that integrated reports can provide information material to investment appraisal. The assertion that integrated reports reduce information asymmetry and influence investment decisions has to be treated with caution. Research limitations/implications: Self-selection bias and a potential lack of transferability in the findings are issues inherent in the research method and sample used. Practical implications: IR information needs to be frequently updated rather than disclosed in a periodic report. Furthermore, integrated reports need to demonstrate a direct link between non-financial performance and financial value creation. Social implications: Mandating the supply of integrated reports is unlikely to influence investors' capital allocation decisions unless investor demand is a driver of the regulation. Originality/value: This study is one of the few to investigate IR from the investor's perspective. Observations from this preliminary study warrant further investigations into the relevance of IR to investment communities globally.