Protectionist vs liberalised maritime cabotage policies: a review. Issue 3 (31st October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paixão Casaca, Ana Cristina; Lyridis, Dimitrios V.
• Is Part Of: Maritime business review. Volume 3:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 210
• Page End: 242
• Publication Date: 2018-10-31
• Subjects: European Union -- Liberalization -- Policy -- Protectionism -- Cabotage -- Rest of the world; Shipping -- Periodicals; 387.5
• DOI: 10.1108/MABR-03-2018-0011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2397-3757

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The development of the current European economic area maritime cabotage market occurred when, at a policy level, the European Union forced the opening of its member-states cabotage markets to Community shipowners and extended this openness, in 1997, to the european free trade area countries. A two-tier cabotage market emerged, where a European economic area legislative framework co-exists with the legislative acts of each member-state. With such a unique background, this paper aims to investigate both the European economic area member-states and the rest of the world cabotage regimes and identify a list of reasons and policy measures used to implement cabotage policies. Design/methodology/approach: By means of a desk research methodological approach, this paper analyses, from a geographical perspective, different countries' cabotage policies and classifies them, and identifies in a systematically way a set of reasons and policy instruments that support each of chosen policies approach. Findings: The outcome indicates that only a few countries promote free liberalised cabotage services and that most countries favour protectionist cabotage policies, whose governments can control the number of foreign vessels participating in these trades. Cabotage regimes have been categorised and the reasons behind both policies and respective policy instruments have been identified. Originality/value: Quite often, researchers only focus on the cabotage policies of the European economic area countries, the USA, Australia, Japan and South Korea. This paper value rests on its ability to incorporate cabotage policies from other African, Asian and Latin American countries and to update existing information on the subject. Overall, this paper paves the way to broaden the cabotage knowledge.