Terrestrial ecosystem restoration increases biodiversity and reduces its variability, but not to reference levels: A global meta‐analysis. (12th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Atkinson, Joe; Brudvig, Lars A.; Mallen‐Cooper, Max; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Moles, Angela T.; Bonser, Stephen P.
• Editors: Crowther, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Ecology letters. Volume 25:Number 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1725
• Page End: 1737
• Publication Date: 2022-05-12
• Subjects: biodiversity -- ecological restoration -- lnCVR -- meta‐analysis -- terrestrial -- variability; Ecology -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ele.14025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1461-023X

Abstract

Abstract: Ecological restoration projects often have variable and unpredictable outcomes, and these can limit the overall impact on biodiversity. Previous syntheses have investigated restoration effectiveness by comparing average restored conditions to average conditions in unrestored or reference systems. Here, we provide the first quantification of the extent to which restoration affects both the mean and variability of biodiversity outcomes, through a global meta‐analysis of 83 terrestrial restoration studies. We found that, relative to unrestored (degraded) sites, restoration actions increased biodiversity by an average of 20%, while decreasing the variability of biodiversity (quantified by the coefficient of variation) by an average of 14%. As restorations aged, mean biodiversity increased and variability decreased relative to unrestored sites. However, restoration sites remained, on average, 13% below the biodiversity of reference (target) ecosystems, and were characterised by higher (20%) variability. The lower mean and higher variability in biodiversity at restored sites relative to reference sites remained consistent over time, suggesting that sources of variation (e.g. prior land use, restoration practices) have an enduring influence on restoration outcomes. Our results point to the need for new research confronting the causes of variability in restoration outcomes, and close variability and biodiversity gaps between restored and reference conditions. Abstract : For the first time, we assess the response of terrestrial biodiversity to restoration measures considering variability alongside mean response. We find that on average, restoration increases mean biodiversity and decreases variability of biodiversity. However, reference sites consistently display both the highest mean and least variable levels of biodiversity.