The false positive rates for detecting keratoconus and potential ectatic corneal conditions when evaluating astigmatic eyes with Scheimpflug Technology. Issue 5 (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Henriquez, Maria A.; Hadid, Marta; Moctezuma, Cristobal; Izquierdo, Luis; Binder, Perry S.
• Is Part Of: European journal of ophthalmology. Volume 32:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 2532
• Page End: 2546
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Astigmatism correction surgery -- corneal topography -- imaging systems -- optics/refraction/instruments -- screening techniques; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; Eye -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 617.7005
• DOI: 10.1177/11206721221081467
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-6721

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the false positive rates for keratoconus (KC) and potential ectatic corneal conditions in highly astigmatism eyes when using published parameters/indices obtained from the Pentacam and Galilei units. Setting: Oftalmosalud Instituto de Ojos, Lima, Peru. Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: 67 consecutive eyes with corneal astigmatism > 1.5 D, with a minimum follow ups of 36 months after an uneventful LASIK procedure were included. Indices for KC and other potential ectatic corneal conditions (subclinical KC, forme fruste KC, suspect KC) were obtained using the Pentacam and Galilei Scheimpflug cameras. Main outcome measures: The false positive rates for KC and potential ectatic corneal conditions were measured. Cut off values provided by previous studies and company-based parameters were used to assess the rate of false positivity. Results: The range of false positive rates for a KC diagnosis depending on the lowest and highest cutoff values were: index of height decentration (61% - 1%), index of surface variance (76% - 0%), Posterior elevation (55% - 0%), maximum Ambrosio Relational thickness (100% - 13%), Belin Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display total deviation value (100% - 4%), Average pachymetric progression index (69% - 3%), Pachymetry at the thinnest point (58% - 1%), CSI Center Surround Index (100%), Differential sector index (51%). Conclusion: The false positive rates for KC and ectatic corneal conditions vary dramatically depending on the cut-off values used. Some indexes used for diagnosis of potential ectatic corneal conditions are inaccurate in normal, highly astigmatic eyes.