Comparing the effects and safety of dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate versus brimonidine after neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy posterior capsule opacification. Issue 5 (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Çakmak, Kaan; Erbil, Hasan; Mesci, Cem; Korkmaz, Şafak
• Is Part Of: European journal of ophthalmology. Volume 32:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 2928
• Page End: 2934
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Glaucoma medical therapies -- glaucoma -- epidemiology/risk factors -- practice management -- socioeconomics and education in medicine/ophthalmology -- preventive medicine/screening -- lens/cataract; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; Eye -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 617.7005
• DOI: 10.1177/11206721211052163
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-6721

Abstract

Aim: Posterior capsular opacification is treated using neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy that leads to increased intraocular pressure. Here, we compare the effects of dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate versus brimonidine on intraocular pressure. We also investigate their side effects after neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy. In these patients, there are no prior studies comparing the results of these two drugs. Materials: Ninety patients with posterior capsule opacification contributed to the study. They received yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy. After yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy, they were randomized into three groups. Group 1 received dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate; Group 2 took brimonidine; and Group 3, the control group, took no drug. Group 1 took dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate eye drops 1 h before the procedure and on the third hour of the first day and two times per day between the second and the seventh days. Group 2 took brimonidine eye drops 1 h before the procedure and on the third hour of the first day, two times per day between the second and the seventh days. Results: Brimonidine had a similar side effect profile to the fix combination. Intraocular pressure on the first ( p = 0.87) and third days ( p = 0.124) were similar in Group 1 (dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate), Group 2 (brimonidine) and the control group. The mean intraocular pressure value of the control group was significantly higher than Groups 1 and 2 because the anti-glaucomatous effects of the drugs become prominent on the seventh day ( p = 0.041). In Group 1 and Group 2, intraocular pressure was significantly lower than the control group on the seventh day ( p = 0.041). Stinging, itching, hyperemia and Tyndall rates were similar in Group 1, Group 2 and the control group. Watery eyes were less common in the brimonidine group than in the dorzolamide hydrochloride–timolol maleate and the control groups on the seventh day ( p = 0.02). Brimonidine also significantly lowered the chemosis rate on the third ( p = 0.04) and seventh ( p = 0.03) days. Conclusion: We suggest that brimonidine and a combination of dorzolamide + timolol are similarly effective at reducing eye pressure for routine cases. In cases where intraocular pressure attacks might be at higher risk, using the dorzolamide + timolol combination would be more appropriate.