Prognostic value of two‐dimensional strain in early ischemic heart disease: A 5‐year follow‐up study. Issue 6 (7th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Licordari, Roberto; Casale, Matteo; Correale, Michele; Imbalzano, Egidio; Crea, Pasquale; Santo Signorelli, Salvatore; Pistelli, Lorenzo; Parisi, Francesca; Perna, Alessia; de Sarro, Rosalba; de Gregorio, Cesare; Dattilo, Giuseppe
• Is Part Of: Echocardiography. Volume 39:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: 768
• Page End: 775
• Publication Date: 2022-05-07
• Subjects: dipyridamole stress echocardiography -- Global Circumferential Strain -- Global Longitudinal Strain -- stress echocardiography -- two‐dimensional strain echocardiography; Echocardiography -- Periodicals; Echocardiography -- Periodicals; 616.1207543
• DOI: 10.1111/echo.15360
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0742-2822

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Two‐dimensional strain echocardiography (2D‐SE) is a reliable method for measuring deformation of the left ventricle. Aim of the study: Aim of the study was to determine changes in 2D‐SE parameters over time collected during dipyridamole stress echo‐cardiography (dipy‐stress) and prognosis of patients with non‐diagnostic dipy‐stress results. Methods: In the first phase of the study, assessment of a prospective enrolled population with a non‐diagnostic dipy‐stress test result was conducted, checking through coronary CT angiography (CCTA) the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD). In the follow‐up phase, an echocardiographic re‐evaluation and outcome analysis during a mean follow‐up of 78 months was carried out. Results: In the first phase, Global Circumferential Strain (GCS) values were similar in the CCTA positive and CCTA negative groups at rest and after stress. For Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), there was a significant reduction ( p < .0001) in the CCTA positive group compared to the CCTA negative group. After 78 ± 9 months none of the enrolled patients experimented cardiac events. Values of GCS, both at rest and after stress, did not differ statistically comparing follow‐up values with baseline ones. No statistically significant changes were seen in the same analysis for GLS rest and stress values, between baseline and follow‐up in the two groups. Conclusions: Performing 2D‐SE during dipy‐stress can detect mild CAD that conventional stress‐tests miss. Patients with mild coronary stenosis may have a favorable mid‐term prognosis, but efforts should be made to investigate the decrease trend in GLS, at rest and after stress, reported in this patient group.