Rural hospitals are not associated with worse postoperative outcomes for colon cancer surgery. Issue 3 (20th May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Rural hospitals are not associated with worse postoperative outcomes for colon cancer surgery. Issue 3 (20th May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Rural hospitals are not associated with worse postoperative outcomes for colon cancer surgery
- Authors:
- Lansing, Shan S.
Diaz, Adrian
Hyer, Madison
Tsilimigras, Diamantis
Pawlik, Timothy M. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Purpose: We sought to determine whether colorectal cancer surgery can be done safely at rural hospitals. The current study compared outcomes among rural patients who underwent colon resection at rural and nonrural hospitals. Methods: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent colon resection for cancer between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files. Patients and hospitals were designated as rural based on rural‐urban continuum codes. Risk‐adjusted postoperative outcomes and hospitalization spending were compared among patients undergoing resection at rural versus nonrural hospitals. Results: Among 3, 937 patients who resided in a rural county and underwent colon resection for cancer, mean age was 76.3 (SD: 7.1) years and 1, 432 (36.4%) patients underwent operative procedure at a rural hospital. On multivariable analyses, no differences in postoperative outcomes were noted among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colon resection for cancer at nonrural versus rural hospitals. Specifically, the risk‐adjusted probability of experiencing a postoperative complication at a nonrural hospital was 15.4% (95% CI: 14.1%‐16.8%) versus 16.3% (95% CI: 14.2%‐18.3%) at a rural hospital (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.38); 30‐day mortality (nonrural: 2.9%, 95% CI: 2.2‐3.6 vs rural: 3.5%, 95% CI: 2.4‐4.5) was also comparable. In addition, price standardized, risk‐adjusted expenditures were similar at nonrural ($18, 610, 95% CI: $18, 037‐$19, 183) andAbstract: Purpose: We sought to determine whether colorectal cancer surgery can be done safely at rural hospitals. The current study compared outcomes among rural patients who underwent colon resection at rural and nonrural hospitals. Methods: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent colon resection for cancer between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files. Patients and hospitals were designated as rural based on rural‐urban continuum codes. Risk‐adjusted postoperative outcomes and hospitalization spending were compared among patients undergoing resection at rural versus nonrural hospitals. Results: Among 3, 937 patients who resided in a rural county and underwent colon resection for cancer, mean age was 76.3 (SD: 7.1) years and 1, 432 (36.4%) patients underwent operative procedure at a rural hospital. On multivariable analyses, no differences in postoperative outcomes were noted among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colon resection for cancer at nonrural versus rural hospitals. Specifically, the risk‐adjusted probability of experiencing a postoperative complication at a nonrural hospital was 15.4% (95% CI: 14.1%‐16.8%) versus 16.3% (95% CI: 14.2%‐18.3%) at a rural hospital (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.38); 30‐day mortality (nonrural: 2.9%, 95% CI: 2.2‐3.6 vs rural: 3.5%, 95% CI: 2.4‐4.5) was also comparable. In addition, price standardized, risk‐adjusted expenditures were similar at nonrural ($18, 610, 95% CI: $18, 037‐$19, 183) and rural ($19, 010, 95% CI: $18, 630‐$19, 390) hospitals. Conclusion: Among rural Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a colon resection for cancer, there were no differences in postoperative outcomes among nonrural versus rural hospitals. These findings serve to highlight the importance of policies and practice guidelines that secure safe, local surgical care, allowing rural clinicians to accommodate strong patient preferences while delivering high‐quality surgical care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of rural health. Volume 38:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of rural health
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0038-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 650
- Page End:
- 659
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05-20
- Subjects:
- access to care -- cancer -- colon -- rural -- surgery
Rural health -- Periodicals
Rural health -- United States -- Periodicals
Medicine, Rural -- Periodicals
Medicine, Rural -- United States -- Periodicals
362.104257 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-0361 ↗
http://proxy.kcumb.edu/login?url=http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00005308-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jrh ↗
http://www.nrharural.org/pubs/sub/JRH.html ↗
http://www.NRHArural.org/pagefile/rh.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jrh/22/4 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jrh.12596 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0890-765X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5052.128850
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22120.xml