Trends in outpatient versus inpatient urologic surgery at a university academic medical center. Issue 4 (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Madhusoodanan, Vinayak; Carto, Chase; Parmar, Madhumita; Ritch, Chad; Parekh, Dipen J.; Ramasamy, Ranjith
• Is Part Of: Current opinion in urology. Volume 32:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 433
• Page End: 437
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: health services -- inpatient -- outpatient -- urology -- volumes; Urology -- Periodicals; Review Literature -- Bibliography; Review Literature -- Periodicals; Male Urogenital Diseases -- Bibliography; Male Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Female Urogenital Diseases -- Bibliography; Female Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Bibliography; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.6005
• DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000995
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-6586

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose of review: To analyze trends in outpatient and inpatient urologic surgeries at a large university academic medical center and test the hypothesis that the proportion of outpatient surgeries has been increasing as compared to inpatient surgeries in urology. Recent findings: We analyzed a total of 33, 054 claims for urologic surgeries at a large university academic medical center from 2010 to 2020, of which 23.2% met inpatient criteria ( n = 7695), whereas 76.7% were outpatient ( n = 25, 359). Although outpatient claims increased yearly by an average of 24%, inpatient claims increased yearly by an average of only 1%. Over the same period, Medicare-specific outpatient claims mirrored these trends, and Medicare-specific inpatient claims decreased. Summary: Outcomes of inpatient surgeries are used as a metric for quality by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as well as US News and World Report (USNWR) rankings. However, with increasing numbers of minimally invasive operations, a large proportion of urologic surgeries are performed on an outpatient basis. As this trend continues, it will be important for organizations like CMS and USNWR to incorporate methods of measuring quality that better reflect outpatient surgical outcomes for the urologic subspecialty.