Quality and clinical generalizability of feasibility outcomes in exercise prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery – A systematic review. Issue 7 (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cuijpers, Anne C.M.; Linskens, Fieke G.; Bongers, Bart C.; Stassen, Laurents P.S.; Lubbers, Tim; van Meeteren, Nico L.U.
• Is Part Of: European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 48:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1483
• Page End: 1497
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: Feasibility studies -- Prehabilitation -- Colorectal cancer -- Data quality -- Clinical generalizability; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Oncologie; Chirurgie (geneeskunde); Electronic journals; Electronic journals -- Sciences; Electronic journals -- Medicine; Electronic journals; 616.994059005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0748-7983

Abstract

Abstract: Suboptimal quality of feasibility assessments might partially explain inconsistencies observed in the effectiveness of exercise prehabilitation before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. This systematic review aimed to assess the reporting quality and clinical generalizability of feasibility outcomes in feasibility studies addressing exercise prehabilitation before CRC surgery. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched to identify all feasibility studies focussing on exercise prehabilitation in CRC surgery. Reporting quality was assessed using the Thabane et al. checklist and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for feasibility studies. Clinical generalizability was evaluated by appraising patient participation in all steps of the study and intervention. Twelve studies were included. The main feasibility outcome in all studies was adherence to the intervention by the study sample. Based on adherence, 10 studies (83%) concluded exercise prehabilitation to be feasible. Six studies (50%) reported all details to assess patient participation showing retention rates between 18.4% and 58.2%, which was caused by non-participation and drop-out. Three feasibility studies (25%) discussed patient-reported barriers to participation and five additional studies (41%) described potential selection bias. Four studies (33%) reported lessons learned to solve issues hampering feasibility and clinical generalizability. Results suggest that true feasibility of exercise prehabilitation before CRC surgery remains questionable due to poor reporting quality, insufficient clarity regarding the representativeness of the study sample for the target population, and limited attention for clinical generalizability. Feasibility of exercise prehabilitation might be improved by offering supervised community- or home-based interventions tailored to the physical and mental abilities of the patient. Highlights: Feasibility of exercise prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery remains questionable Feasibility studies insufficiently report feasibility for patients to participate It is often unclear if study populations adequately represent the entire target populations Feasibility studies should focus explicitly on external validity of the results Patient-reported barriers to participation should be considered