Fine‐scale resource selection and behavioral tradeoffs of eastern wild turkey broods. Issue 5 (5th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nelson, Stefan D.; Keever, Allison C.; Wightman, Patrick H.; Bakner, Nicholas W.; Argabright, Chad M.; Byrne, Michael E.; Collier, Bret A.; Chamberlain, Michael J.; Cohen, Bradley S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 86:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-04-05
• Subjects: brood -- forage -- habitat selection -- Meleagris gallopavo silvestris -- poults -- thermoregulation -- tradeoffs -- wild turkey; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22222
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

Abstract: Resource heterogeneity across the landscape prompts animals to make behavioral tradeoffs to survive and reproduce. Behavioral thermoregulation can buffer organisms from thermal extremes but may conflict with other essential activities such as predator avoidance or foraging, and necessitate tradeoffs among resource requirements. We evaluated patterns of habitat selection relative to thermal conditions, forage availability, and concealment cover for female eastern wild turkeys ( Meleagris gallopavo silvestris ) with broods to assess potential tradeoffs among resource requirements. We quantified air temperature (°C), vegetation characteristics (e.g., visual obstruction), and arthropod biomass (g/m 2 ) at locations used by broods across 5 study sites in the southeastern United States during May–July 2019–2020. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate brooding female resource selection at the second (home range) and third (within home range) orders. Specifically, we identified differences in selection between brooding and non‐brooding females (second order), and factors influencing selection of sites used by brooding females during the day (when loafing and foraging) and night (roosting; third order). Brooding females selected sites with cooler temperatures (β = −0.22; 95% CI = −0.338–−0.102) and greater ground cover vegetation (β = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.013–0.033) than non‐brooding females. Additionally, biomass of large prey (Orthoptera) was positively related to ambient temperature, suggesting that use of thermal refuge by brooding females may limit availability of large prey. Brooding females appeared to balance the tradeoff between thermal refuge and forage availability by altering habitat selection patterns within home ranges. Brooding females selected for herbaceous areas that provided greater biomass of large arthropods during the day, and avoided areas dominated by woody vegetation during both the day and night. We did not observe brooding females using locations where woody cover exceeded 27% of understory vegetation. Thermal refuge is an important component of brood habitat, but within thermally suitable areas brooding females can select sites with greater availability of large prey to meet energetic demands of broods. Evaluation of multiple spatial scales is key when assessing tradeoffs among resource needs and determining the potential of behavioral thermoregulation to buffer an organism's thermal environment and allow persistence in a warming climate. Abstract : We evaluated patterns of habitat selection relative to thermal conditions, forage availability, and concealment cover for eastern wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo silvestris ) brooding females to assess potential tradeoffs among resource requirements. Biomass of large prey (i.e., Orthoptera) was positively correlated with ambient temperature, suggesting that use of thermal refuge by brooding females may limit availability of large prey. However, brooding females appeared to balance the tradeoff between thermal refuge and forage availability by altering habitat selection patterns within home ranges.