Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: Development of an empirical approach for water-quality management. (1st January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: Development of an empirical approach for water-quality management. (1st January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: Development of an empirical approach for water-quality management
- Authors:
- Zhang, Qian
Fisher, Thomas R.
Trentacoste, Emily M.
Buchanan, Claire
Gustafson, Anne B.
Karrh, Renee
Murphy, Rebecca R.
Keisman, Jennifer
Wu, Cuiyin
Tian, Richard
Testa, Jeremy M.
Tango, Peter J. - Abstract:
- Highlights: CART models were developed to predict nutrient limitation in Chesapeake Bay. The approach satisfactorily reproduced bioassay-based nutrient limitation patterns. The Bay showed more space of nitrogen-limitation in 2007–2017 than 1992–2002. Nutrient limitation patterns in the Bay appear to vary with hydrologic conditions. Further nutrient reductions are needed to achieve a less nutrient-saturated system. Abstract: Understanding the temporal and spatial roles of nutrient limitation on phytoplankton growth is necessary for developing successful management strategies. Chesapeake Bay has well-documented seasonal and spatial variations in nutrient limitation, but it remains unknown whether these patterns of nutrient limitation have changed in response to nutrient management efforts. We analyzed historical data from nutrient bioassay experiments (1992–2002) and data from long-term, fixed-site water-quality monitoring program (1990–2017) to develop empirical approaches for predicting nutrient limitation in the surface waters of the mainstem Bay. Results from classification and regression trees (CART) matched the seasonal and spatial patterns of bioassay-based nutrient limitation in the 1992–2002 period much better than two simpler, non-statistical approaches. An ensemble approach of three selected CART models satisfactorily reproduced the bioassay-based results (classification rate = 99%). This empirical approach can be used to characterize nutrient limitation fromHighlights: CART models were developed to predict nutrient limitation in Chesapeake Bay. The approach satisfactorily reproduced bioassay-based nutrient limitation patterns. The Bay showed more space of nitrogen-limitation in 2007–2017 than 1992–2002. Nutrient limitation patterns in the Bay appear to vary with hydrologic conditions. Further nutrient reductions are needed to achieve a less nutrient-saturated system. Abstract: Understanding the temporal and spatial roles of nutrient limitation on phytoplankton growth is necessary for developing successful management strategies. Chesapeake Bay has well-documented seasonal and spatial variations in nutrient limitation, but it remains unknown whether these patterns of nutrient limitation have changed in response to nutrient management efforts. We analyzed historical data from nutrient bioassay experiments (1992–2002) and data from long-term, fixed-site water-quality monitoring program (1990–2017) to develop empirical approaches for predicting nutrient limitation in the surface waters of the mainstem Bay. Results from classification and regression trees (CART) matched the seasonal and spatial patterns of bioassay-based nutrient limitation in the 1992–2002 period much better than two simpler, non-statistical approaches. An ensemble approach of three selected CART models satisfactorily reproduced the bioassay-based results (classification rate = 99%). This empirical approach can be used to characterize nutrient limitation from long-term water-quality monitoring data on much broader geographic and temporal scales than would be feasible using bioassays, providing a new tool for informing water-quality management. Results from our application of the approach to 21 tidal monitoring stations for the period of 2007–2017 showed modest changes in nutrient limitation patterns, with expanded areas of nitrogen-limitation and contracted areas of nutrient saturation (i.e., not limited by nitrogen or phosphorus). These changes imply that long-term reductions in nitrogen load have led to expanded areas with nutrient-limited phytoplankton growth in the Bay, reflecting long-term water-quality improvements in the context of nutrient enrichment. However, nutrient limitation patterns remain unchanged in the majority of the mainstem, suggesting that nutrient loads should be further reduced to achieve a less nutrient-saturated ecosystem. Graphical abstract: Image, graphical abstract … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Water research. Volume 188(2021)
- Journal:
- Water research
- Issue:
- Volume 188(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 188, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 188
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0188-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01-01
- Subjects:
- Nutrient limitation -- Phytoplankton -- Bioassay -- Water quality -- Long-term monitoring -- Nutrient management
Water -- Pollution -- Research -- Periodicals
363.7394 - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1769499.html ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00431354 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116407 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0043-1354
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9273.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22041.xml