Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0. (12th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Winton, M.; Adcroft, A.; Dunne, J. P.; Held, I. M.; Shevliakova, E.; Zhao, M.; Guo, H.; Hurlin, W.; Krasting, J.; Knutson, T.; Paynter, D.; Silvers, L. G.; Zhang, R.
• Is Part Of: Journal of advances in modeling earth systems. Volume 12:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-01-12
• Subjects: Geological modeling -- Periodicals; Climatology -- Periodicals; Geochemical modeling -- Periodicals; 551.5011
• DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001838
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1942-2466

Abstract

Abstract: GFDL's new CM4.0 climate model has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities near the middle of the upper half of CMIP5 models. The CMIP5 models have been criticized for excessive sensitivity based on observations of present‐day warming and heat uptake and estimates of radiative forcing. An ensemble of historical simulations with CM4.0 produces warming and heat uptake that are consistent with these observations under forcing that is at the middle of the assessed distribution. Energy budget‐based methods for estimating sensitivities based on these quantities underestimate CM4.0's sensitivities when applied to its historical simulations. However, we argue using a simple attribution procedure that CM4.0's warming evolution indicates excessive transient sensitivity to greenhouse gases. This excessive sensitivity is offset prior to recent decades by excessive response to aerosol and land use changes. Plain Language Summary: We evaluate the climate sensitivity of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) CM4.0 climate model. Climate sensitivity is an important factor determining the magnitude of future climate change under anthropogenic forcing. We find that CM4.0 is a high climate sensitivity model. A simple method for estimating climate sensitivity from historical changes significantly underestimates CM4.0's sensitivity when applied to CM4.0's historical simulation. However, more sophisticated methods that make use of the detailed evolution of global warming identify CM4.0 as most likely too sensitive to anthropogenic forcing. Key Points: CM4.0 has high equilibrium and transient climate sensitivities, both near the CMIP5 75th percentile The energy budget sensitivity estimation method significantly underestimates CM4.0's sensitivities CM4.0's excessive warming over recent decades most likely indicates excessive transient sensitivity