Healthcare Access in Rural Alabama: Patients' Perspective on Access and Utilization. Issue 7 (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smoak, Ansley; Kim, Young-Il; Peral, Sylvia; Scarinci, Isabel
• Is Part Of: Southern medical journal. Volume 115:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 414
• Page End: 419
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: access -- disparities -- primary care -- rural -- urban; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001415
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0038-4348

Abstract

Abstract : Although lack of access to care is many times cited as the primary cause of rural–urban health disparities, access often is measured from the provider's perspective (eg, provider density). The authors conducted a population-based survey in two of the most rural counties in the United States (located in Alabama) to assess healthcare access from the residents' perspective and found that healthcare access in these rural counties is comparable to that in urban settings. Questions in their survey match the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which often is criticized for not being representative of rural areas. Trends in the authors' rigorously collected data closely match those observed in the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, indicating that it provides an adequate picture of healthcare access from a healthcare utilization perspective in rural areas. Abstract: Objectives: Increasing healthcare access is a Healthy People 2030 priority. This study examined healthcare access from the residents' perspective in the two most rural counties in the United States and compared the findings with data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in rural and urban counties in Alabama. Methods: We conducted an in-person population-based survey using cluster sampling within census tracts assessing health insurance coverage, having a usual primary care provider, having had a routine healthcare visit within the past year, and barriers to care. Results: Among the 395 participants, 81.4% indicated having health insurance coverage, which was slightly lower than the BRFSS data for rural (87.6%) and urban counties in Alabama (87%); 89.6% of respondents indicated having a usual primary care provider compared with 84.3% of rural and 77.2% of urban residents; and 83.2% of participants indicated having had a routine healthcare visit in the last year compared with 77.3% of rural and 77.6% of urban residents. These indicators varied significantly across age, sex, and educational attainment and were consistent with BRFSS findings. Conclusions: Healthcare access, as indicated by health insurance coverage and healthcare utilization, among residents in the two most rural US counties is comparable to access among rural and urban Alabamians. Primary care is a highly used resource in rural areas, and further research should characterize other social/behavioral factors that may explain the poor health outcomes seen in rural areas. In addition, BRFSS data continue to offer a reliable picture of healthcare access in rural areas.