Spatio–temporal patterns of cognitive control revealed with simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Issue 1 (26th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hinault, Thomas; Larcher, Kevin; Zazubovits, Natalja; Gotman, Jean; Dagher, Alain
• Is Part Of: Human brain mapping. Volume 40:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 80
• Page End: 97
• Publication Date: 2018-09-26
• Subjects: cognitive control -- conflict adaptation -- dynamic causal modeling -- numerical Stroop -- simultaneous EEG‐fMRI; Brain mapping -- Periodicals; 611.81
• DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24356
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1065-9471

Abstract

Abstract: Optimal performance depends in part on the ability to inhibit the automatic processing of irrelevant information and also on the adjusting the level of control from one trial to the next. In this study, we investigated the spatio–temporal neural correlates of cognitive control using simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography, while 22 participants (10 women) performed a numerical Stroop task. We investigated the spatial and temporal dynamic of the conflict adaptation effects (i.e., reduced interference on items that follow an incongruent stimulus compared to after a congruent stimulus). Joint independent component analysis linked the N200 component to activation of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the conflict slow potential to widespread activations within the fronto–parietal executive control network. Connectivity analyses with psychophysiological interactions and dynamic causal modeling demonstrated coordinated engagement of the cognitive control network after the processing of an incongruent item, and this was correlated with better behavioral performance. Our results combined high spatial and temporal resolution to propose the following network of conflict adaptation effect and specify the time course of activation within this model: first, the anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus are activated when incongruence is detected. These regions then signal the need for higher control to the ACC, which in turn activates the fronto–parietal executive control network to improve the performance on the next trial.