Clinical utility of expanded non‐invasive prenatal screening and chromosomal microarray analysis in high‐risk pregnancy. (1st March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhu, X.; Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; Chau, M. H. K.; Yan, H.; Cao, Y.; Kwok, Y. K. Y.; Chen, J.; Hui, A. S. Y.; Zhang, R.; Meng, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Leung, T. Y.; Xiong, L.; Kong, X.; Choy, K. W.
• Is Part Of: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 57:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 459
• Page End: 465
• Publication Date: 2021-03-01
• Subjects: chromosomal microarray analysis -- copy‐number variants -- expanded NIPS -- non‐invasive prenatal screening -- non‐invasive prenatal testing -- rare aneuploidies; Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals; 618.047543
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.22021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-7692

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the utility of expanded non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), compared with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in high‐risk pregnancies. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study of singleton pregnancies at high risk for chromosomal abnormality. Patients who underwent expanded NIPS and CMA sequentially during pregnancy from 2015 to 2019 were included in the analysis. Pregnancies with a positive result for sex chromosome aneuploidy were excluded as the full details could not be retrieved. The utility of expanded NIPS and CMA for detection of chromosomal abnormalities in this cohort was compared by assessing the concordance between the results. Results: Of the 774 included high‐risk pregnancies, 550 (71.1%) had a positive NIPS result, while a positive CMA result was detected in 308 (39.8%) cases. The rate of full or partial concordance between NIPS and CMA was 82.2%, 59.6% and 25.0% for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively. For rare aneuploidies and segmental imbalances, NIPS and CMA results were fully or partially concordant in 7.5% and 33.3% of cases, respectively. Copy‐number variants < 5 Mb were detected more often by CMA, with an incidence of 7.9% (61/774) compared with 3.1% (24/774) by NIPS. A genetic aberration was detected by CMA in 1 in 17 (5.8%) high‐risk pregnancies that had a negative or non‐reportable NIPS result. Conclusion: CMA allows for comprehensive detection of genome‐wide chromosomal abnormalities in high‐risk pregnancies. CMA should be offered instead of expanded NIPS for high‐risk pregnancies. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.