Effectiveness of seed sowing techniques for sloped restoration sites. Issue 6 (21st April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tamura, Nicole; Lulow, Megan E.; Halsch, Chris A.; Major, Matthew R.; Balazs, Kathleen R.; Austin, Paige; Huxman, Travis E.; Kimball, Sarah
• Is Part Of: Restoration ecology. Volume 25:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: 942
• Page End: 952
• Publication Date: 2017-04-21
• Subjects: coastal sage scrub -- cost‐effective restoration -- erosion control -- restoration of steep slopes -- seeding methods -- seed weight -- native establishment; Restoration ecology -- Periodicals; Reclamation of land -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7153
• DOI: 10.1111/rec.12515
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1061-2971

Abstract

Abstract: Practitioners are challenged with choosing among many potentially effective methods for sowing seed in ecological restoration projects to achieve sufficient native plant establishment. We tested the effectiveness of seed sowing techniques on moderate and steep slopes in a Mediterranean climate by measuring native seedling density immediately following germination, as well as plant density, recruitment success, and soil movement through the second growing season. We calculated cost effectiveness of different methods as the native plant density per dollar spent sowing seed. While all sowing techniques resulted in significant native establishment compared with unseeded controls, hydro seeding on moderate slopes was the most cost effective (native seedlings established per dollar spent). Although all steep‐sloped seeding techniques resulted in high densities of native species, all methods also resulted in significant soil loss. Shrubs preferred hand seeding followed by jute netting on steep slopes, while forbs reached greatest densities with hydro seeding on moderate slopes. Seedlings of species with heavy seeds were present in greater densities than species with lighter seeds in imprint sowing treatments. The "best" seed sowing technique varied depending on slope and metric of success (native density, species richness, shrub density, or forb density). Different combinations of slope, technique, and success metric resulted in significantly different project costs, which implies opportunities for savings given careful decision‐making relative to mitigation needs on heterogeneous landscapes. Evaluations of techniques for restoring slopes are limited, yet critical for expanding the area capable of being restored and the application of limited conservation funding.