Anastomosis behind the sternoclavicular joint is associated with increased incidence of anastomotic stenosis in retrosternal reconstruction with a gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Issue 4 (29th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kurahashi, Yasunori; Ishida, Yoshinori; Kumamoto, Tsutomu; Nakanishi, Yasutaka; Hojo, Yudai; Igeta, Masataka; Takemura, Masashi; Shinohara, Hisashi
• Is Part Of: Diseases of the esophagus. Volume 34:Issue 4(2021)
• Publication Date: 2020-09-29
• Subjects: anastomotic stenosis -- esophagectomy -- retrosternal reconstruction -- sternoclavicular joint; Esophagus -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.32
• DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa089
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-8694

Abstract

Abstract: Anastomotic stenosis after esophagectomy is a major cause of long-term morbidity because it leads to poor dietary intake and malnutrition that markedly reduces the quality of life. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that anastomosis behind the sternoclavicular (SC) joint in retrosternal reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic stenosis compared with anastomosis deviated from the joint. Among 226 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2010 and March 2019, we selected 114 patients who underwent retrosternal reconstruction using a gastric conduit for this study. They were classified into two groups according to the location of the anastomosis as determined by axial sections on postoperative computed tomography scans: anastomosis located behind the SC joint (Group B; n = 71) and anastomosis deviated from the joint (Group D; n = 43). The primary endpoint was the difference in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis between the two groups. Whether the occurrence of anastomotic leak affected the likelihood of anastomotic stenosis was also investigated. The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was significantly higher in Group B than in Group D (71.8% [ n = 51] vs. 18.6% [ n = 8]; P < 0.0001). The incidence of stenosis in patients who developed an anastomotic leak was significantly higher in Group B than in Group D (88.0% vs. 41.7%; P = 0.0057), although the findings were similar in patients who did not develop anastomotic leak (63.0% and 9.7%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We conclude that anastomosis located behind the SC joint in retrosternal reconstruction with a gastric conduit after esophagectomy is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic stenosis regardless of the development of anastomotic leak.