Coil combination for receive array spectroscopy: Are data‐driven methods superior to methods using computed field maps?. Issue 2 (28th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Coil combination for receive array spectroscopy: Are data‐driven methods superior to methods using computed field maps?. Issue 2 (28th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Coil combination for receive array spectroscopy: Are data‐driven methods superior to methods using computed field maps?
- Authors:
- Rodgers, Christopher T.
Robson, Matthew D. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: Combining spectra from receive arrays, particularly X‐nuclear spectra with low signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs), is challenging. We test whether data‐driven combination methods are better than using computed coil sensitivities. Theory: Several combination algorithms are recast into the notation of Roemer's classic formula, showing that they differ primarily in their estimation of coil receive sensitivities. This viewpoint reveals two extensions of the whitened singular‐value decomposition (WSVD) algorithm, using temporal or temporal + spatial apodization to improve the coil sensitivities, and thus the combined spectral SNR. Methods: Radiofrequency fields from an array were simulated and used to make synthetic spectra. These were combined with 10 algorithms. The combined spectra were then assessed in terms of their SNR. Validation used phantoms and cardiac 31 P spectra from five subjects at 3T. Results: Combined spectral SNRs from simulations, phantoms, and humans showed the same trends. In phantoms, the combined SNR using computed coil sensitivities was lower than with WSVD combination whenever the WSVD SNR was >14 (or >11 with temporal apodization, or >9 with temporal + spatial apodization). These new apodized WSVD methods gave higher SNRs than other data‐driven methods. Conclusion: In the human torso, at frequencies ≥49 MHz, data‐driven combination is preferable to using computed coil sensitivities. Magn Reson, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic ResonanceAbstract : Purpose: Combining spectra from receive arrays, particularly X‐nuclear spectra with low signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs), is challenging. We test whether data‐driven combination methods are better than using computed coil sensitivities. Theory: Several combination algorithms are recast into the notation of Roemer's classic formula, showing that they differ primarily in their estimation of coil receive sensitivities. This viewpoint reveals two extensions of the whitened singular‐value decomposition (WSVD) algorithm, using temporal or temporal + spatial apodization to improve the coil sensitivities, and thus the combined spectral SNR. Methods: Radiofrequency fields from an array were simulated and used to make synthetic spectra. These were combined with 10 algorithms. The combined spectra were then assessed in terms of their SNR. Validation used phantoms and cardiac 31 P spectra from five subjects at 3T. Results: Combined spectral SNRs from simulations, phantoms, and humans showed the same trends. In phantoms, the combined SNR using computed coil sensitivities was lower than with WSVD combination whenever the WSVD SNR was >14 (or >11 with temporal apodization, or >9 with temporal + spatial apodization). These new apodized WSVD methods gave higher SNRs than other data‐driven methods. Conclusion: In the human torso, at frequencies ≥49 MHz, data‐driven combination is preferable to using computed coil sensitivities. Magn Reson, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Magn Reson Med 75:473–487, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 75:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0075-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 473
- Page End:
- 487
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-28
- Subjects:
- MR spectroscopy -- array -- coil combination -- WSVD -- WSVD+Apod -- WSVD+Apod+Blur -- adaptive combination theory
Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals
Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals
616.07548 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/mrm.25618 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0740-3194
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5337.798000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22037.xml