Long‐term outcome of adhesive fragment reattachment in crown‐root fractured teeth. Issue 4 (24th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Soliman, Sebastian; Lang, Lisa‐Marie; Hahn, Britta; Reich, Sebastian; Schlagenhauf, Ulrich; Krastl, Gabriel; Krug, Ralf
• Is Part Of: Dental traumatology. Volume 36:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 417
• Page End: 426
• Publication Date: 2020-02-24
• Subjects: adhesive fragment reattachment -- bone loss -- crown‐root fracture -- dental trauma -- periodontal health -- root fracture; Teeth -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Dentistry, Operative -- Periodicals; Traumatology -- Periodicals; Endodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6
• DOI: 10.1111/edt.12550
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1600-4469

Abstract

Abstract: Background/Aims: Adhesive fragment reattachment (AFR) is one treatment option for crown‐root fractured teeth. However, there are no studies investigating the long‐term outcome of this approach. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of AFR and periodontal health in crown‐root fractured teeth by assessing complications and periodontal status. Materials and Methods: Data regarding 41 patients with 51 traumatized teeth (TT) were included. Periodontal health was assessed by recording the pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BoP), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI) in the TT and in one unaffected control tooth (CT). Complications were classified as "restorative, " "endodontic, " and "additional root fracture." Based on these complications, the outcome was graded as "success, " "partial success, " "survival, " and "failure." Statistics was performed by t test, chi‐square test and logistic regression models. Results: After 8.5 ± 4.6 years, 76.5% (39/51) of the TT had functionally survived. Functional survival of the reattached fragments was 66.7% (26/39) after 9.5 ± 3.7 years. PPD (TT: 4.11 ± 2.03; CT: 2.08 ± 0.65), CAL (TT: 4.78 ± 2.19; CT: 2.42 ± 1.03), and BoP values (TT: 77.4%; CT: 22.6%) were higher in TT than in CT. GI scores > 0 were found in 83.3% of the TT and in 27.8% of the CT. PI scores did not differ between TT and CT. Of the complications, 56.8% were "restorative, " 22.7% "endodontic, " and 20.5% "additional root fractures." Eleven (27.5%) TT were without complications and rated as "success." Conclusions: AFR in crown‐root fractured teeth showed a high survival rate and occasionally compromised periodontal health. However, due to the high complication rate, it should be considered as a long‐term temporary treatment to postpone other invasive therapy options. AFR can be a valuable way to avoid early loss of crown‐root fractured teeth, especially in young patients. Moisture control and additional root fractures significantly influenced the outcome.