Risk factors for gram-negative infection of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: retrospective multicenter study - CarDINe study. (19th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pascale, R; Abdullah, TA; Fabbricatore, D; De Potter, T; Ripa, M; Durante-Mangoni, E; Leventopulos, G; Domenichini, G; Iacopino, S; Akova, M; Diemberger, I; Viale, P; Giannella, M
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 24:Supplement 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05-19
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac053.541
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Dr. Fabbricatore is supported by a research grant from the CardioPaTh PhD Program Background: Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are unfrequently isolated from patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. However, data about risk factors for GNB-CIED-infection and associated clinical outcome are missing. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective case-control-control study. Adult patients undergoing CIED implantation from Jan 2015 to Dec 2019 were included and classified as case (C) if diagnosed of GNB-CIED-infection; control 1 (C1) if diagnosed with Gram positive bacteria (GPB)-CIED infection; and control 2 (C2) if no CIED-infection was diagnosed during the study period. Patients were matched by center and risk period (from CIED implantation to infection diagnosis ±1 month), with a minimum follow-up period after infection diagnosis of 180 days. Results: Study cohort consisted of 134 patients (33 C, 53 C1 and 42 C2) from 11 centers. Overall, 99 (73.9%) were male, median age 73 (IQR 66-81) years. Cardiac diseases leading to CIED implantation were bradi-arrythmia (48%), hearth failure (23.5), and primary prevention (20.6%). There were not differences for demographic variables and Charlson Index between C, C1 and C2. Time from implantation to infection diagnosis was similar between C and C1 [274 (39-621) vs 220 (58-866) days, p=0.581]. Shariff score was lower in C compared with C1 [1(1-2) vs 2 (1-3); p<0.001]. C reported more frequently than C1 a prior infection (not CIED related) (33% vs 16%, p=0.08). GN and GP causative agents of CIED-infection are depicted in Fig.1. No differences regarding CIED-infection type (pocket site, endocarditis) were observed between C and C1. Interestingly, PET-FDG was more frequently performed in C compared with C1 (41.2% vs 17%, p=0.013), with a trend toward higher yielding (83% vs. 50%, p=0.16). CIED extraction was performed in 79.4% and 92.5% (p=0.07) of C and C1, respectively. Length of stay was similar between groups [17 (7-39) vs23 (12-41) days, p=0.326]. 6-month survival was significantly lower in C compared with C1 and C2 at Kaplan Meier analysis (Fig.2). Conclusions: GNB-CIED infection is associated with higher 6-month mortality than GPB- or no-CIED infections, prior GNB infection may favor subsequent GNB-CIED infection, the role of PET-FDG in diagnosing GNB-CIED infection seems to be key.