Anatomically-guided cardioneuroablation for recurrent neurally mediated syncope. (19th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wichterle, D; Stiavnicky, P; Jansova, H; Stojadinovic, P; Haskova, J; Peichl, P; Cihak, R; Kautzner, J
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 24:Supplement 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05-19
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac053.324
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. Background: Cardioneuroablation (CNA) has been proposed as a new therapeutic approach in selected patients with recurrent neurally mediated syncope and documented cardioinhibitory component. Purpose: We report on procedural data and clinical outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent anatomically-guided CNA at our center in the period of 2014 - 2021. Methods: A study investigated 145 otherwise healthy patients (age: 40 ± 14 years, 56% males) with recurrent reflex syncope and the physiological result of the atropine test. Biatrial radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed under general anesthesia by irrigated-tip catheter at empirical sites of ganglionated plexi (GP) with the navigation by CARTO-3 system and intracardiac echocardiography. Anterior right GP and posteromedial left GP were always targeted to modulate the innervation of both sinoatrial (SAN) and atrioventricular (AVN) nodes, irrespective of clinical manifestation of the disease. The loss of responsiveness of both nodes to extracardiac vagus nerve stimulation was the procedural endpoint. Right vagus or bilateral vagus nerve stimulation was used in 86% and 54% of procedures, respectively. Results: Enrolled patients had documented cardioinhibitory disorder of SAN (59%), AVN (30%), or both nodes (11%). CNA (duration: 157 ± 31 min; RF time: 15 ± 6 min; radiation dose: 84 ± 135 µGy.m²) resulted in sinus rate acceleration by 28 ± 12 bpm, shortening of AH interval by 15 ± 31 ms, an increase of Wenckebach point by 28 ± 33 bpm, shortening of AVN effective refractory period by 110 ± 115 ms, and sinus node recovery time by 508 ± 666 ms. During a median follow up of 26 (IQR: 12-39) months, CNA was repeated in 9 patients and is scheduled in 3 other (total 8%). Pacemaker was implanted only in 4 (3%) patients after single (n = 2) or repeated CNA (n = 2). Corresponding Kaplan-Meier curves are provided in the Figure. Any-syncope-free survival is comparable to that reported in active arms of historical and recent pacemaker studies. Conclusions: CNA is a reasonably effective treatment option for patients with functional cardioinhibitory syncope. CNA can be performed by anatomically-guided ablation at empirical GP sites. Our study corroborates the clinical utility of CNA as a viable alternative to pacemaker implant in selected patients.