Feasibility and acceptability of intranasal povidone iodine decolonization among orthopedic trauma surgery patients. (July 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Feasibility and acceptability of intranasal povidone iodine decolonization among orthopedic trauma surgery patients. (July 2022)
- Main Title:
- Feasibility and acceptability of intranasal povidone iodine decolonization among orthopedic trauma surgery patients
- Authors:
- Schweizer, Marin
Herwaldt, Loreen
Boyken, Linda
Pottinger, Jean
Quinn, Rachel
Diekema, Daniel
Pavlik, Fiona Armstrong
Ward, Melissa
Sekar, Poorani
Willey, Michael - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Nasal decolonization significantly decreases the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus surgical-site infections (SSIs). Patient adherence with self-administration of a decolonization ointment (ie, mupirocin) is low, especially among patients having urgent surgery. Povidone-iodine decolonization may overcome patient adherence challenges because povidone-iodine needs to be applied only on the day of surgery. We assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of povidone-iodine decolonization given on the day of surgery among patients having orthopedic trauma surgery. Methods: Adult patients who underwent operative fixation of traumatic lower extremity fractures were consented to receive 10% intranasal povidone-iodine solution. Povidone-iodine was applied ~1 hour before surgical incision and was reapplied the evening after surgery. Patients were tested for S. aureus nasal colonization before surgery, the evening after surgery (before povidone-iodine reapplication), and the day after surgery. Swabs were inoculated into Dey-Engley neutralizer and processed in a vortexer. A series of dilutions were performed and plated on mannitol salt agar plates. S. aureus cultures were quantitatively assessed to determine the reduction in S. aureus after povidone-iodine use. Reductions in S. aureus nasal growth were evaluated using the Skillings-Mack test. SSIs manifesting within 30 and 90 days of surgery were identified using NHSN definitions. A survey was administered theAbstract : Background: Nasal decolonization significantly decreases the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus surgical-site infections (SSIs). Patient adherence with self-administration of a decolonization ointment (ie, mupirocin) is low, especially among patients having urgent surgery. Povidone-iodine decolonization may overcome patient adherence challenges because povidone-iodine needs to be applied only on the day of surgery. We assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of povidone-iodine decolonization given on the day of surgery among patients having orthopedic trauma surgery. Methods: Adult patients who underwent operative fixation of traumatic lower extremity fractures were consented to receive 10% intranasal povidone-iodine solution. Povidone-iodine was applied ~1 hour before surgical incision and was reapplied the evening after surgery. Patients were tested for S. aureus nasal colonization before surgery, the evening after surgery (before povidone-iodine reapplication), and the day after surgery. Swabs were inoculated into Dey-Engley neutralizer and processed in a vortexer. A series of dilutions were performed and plated on mannitol salt agar plates. S. aureus cultures were quantitatively assessed to determine the reduction in S. aureus after povidone-iodine use. Reductions in S. aureus nasal growth were evaluated using the Skillings-Mack test. SSIs manifesting within 30 and 90 days of surgery were identified using NHSN definitions. A survey was administered the morning after surgery to determine the acceptability of intranasal povidone-iodine. Results: In total, 51 patients participated in this pilot study between February 2020 and June 2021. Nasal samples from 12 participants (23.5%) grew S. aureus . The S. aureus concentration decreased significantly across the time points ( P = .03) (Fig. 1 ). No SSIs were identified within 30 days of surgery. One SSI occurred within 90 days of surgery; this patient did not carry S. aureus, and cultures from the infected site were negative. Also, 31% of patients reported at least 1 mild side effect while using povidone-iodine: dripping (n = 7), itching (n = 6), dryness (n = 4), stinging (n = 4), staining (n = 3), unpleasant taste (n = 3), runny nose (n = 2), burning (n = 1), sneezing (n = 1), sore throat (n = 1), tickling (n = 1), and/or cough (n = 1). Also, 86% of patients stated that povidone-iodine felt neutral, pleasant, or very pleasant, and only 14% stated that it felt unpleasant or very unpleasant. Discussion: In this pilot study, 2 applications of nasal povidone-iodine on the day of surgery were acceptable for patients, and this protocol significantly reduced S. aureus concentration in nares of patients. Future large clinical trials should evaluate whether this 2-application regimen of povidone-iodine significantly decreases rates of SSI among orthopedic trauma surgery patients. Funding: PDI Healthcare Disclosures: None … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology. Volume 2(2022)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 2(2022)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0002-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- s62
- Page End:
- s63
- Publication Date:
- 2022-07
- Subjects:
- Anti-infective agents -- Periodicals
Nosocomial infections -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
614.44 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antimicrobial-stewardship-and-healthcare-epidemiology/latest-issue ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/ash.2022.177 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2732-494X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 22019.xml