0092 The Effects of Slow-Oscillatory Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Sleep Physiology in Healthy Humans. (25th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kishi, Akifumi; Togo, Fumiharu; Yamamoto, Yoshiharu
• Is Part Of: Sleep. Volume 45(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A41
• Page End: A42
• Publication Date: 2022-05-25
• Subjects: Sleep -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sleep disorders -- Periodicals; Sommeil -- Aspect physiologique -- Périodiques; Sommeil, Troubles du -- Périodiques; Sleep disorders; Sleep -- Physiological aspects; Sleep -- physiological aspects; Sleep Wake Disorders; Psychophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.8498
• DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac079.090
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-8105

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Recent studies have demonstrated that rocking promotes sleep in animals and humans. The application of an alternating current galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) can elicit body sway like rocking sensation. Here, we examined the effects of slow-oscillatory GVS, which can evoke the virtual rocking sensation in the brain, on objective and subjective sleep quality in healthy young adults. Methods: We studied 14 healthy subjects (age: 22.7 p/m 1.4 years) who underwent 3 nap conditions (adaptation, sham [SHAM], and stimulation [STIM]), where SHAM and STIM were randomly allocated with a 1-week interval in general. The polysomnographic recordings were started at 2 pm and time in bed was restricted to 90 min for all subjects. In both conditions, electrodes were placed on both mastoids for GVS; in STIM condition, the slow-oscillatory (0.25 Hz sinusoidal) GVS was applied throughout the nap period with a current intensity of approximately 80% of sensory thresholds of each subject. The pattern of center of pressure during quiet standing was also measured using a force plate, with or without the same slow-oscillatory GVS. We analyzed sleep variables and electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral power and compared them between STIM and SHAM. Subjective sleep quality was also measured and compared between STIM and SHAM. Results: We confirmed that subsensory slow-oscillatory GVS induced body sway corresponding to the stimulation frequency for all subjects. We found that sleep latency was significantly shorter and total sleep time as well as N2 duration were significantly longer in STIM than in SHAM. N3 duration did not differ significantly between the conditions. EEG power spectrum densities in delta, theta, and sigma bands were significantly greater in STIM than in SHAM. Subjective sleep quality was significantly better in STIM than in SHAM. Conclusion: We demonstrated that subsensory slow-oscillatory GVS facilitated wake-sleep transition and improved objective and subjective sleep quality. The results suggest that weak periodic inputs into vestibular systems promote sleep by modulating the thalamocortical mechanisms in humans. This finding may open a new avenue toward a development of novel techniques for human sleep augmentation. Support (If Any): JST PRESTO (JPMJPR19J3) and JSPS KAKENHI (18K17891) to AK.