Emerging Trends in Nasal Surgery: What Is the Impact of a Bioabsorbable Nasal Implant?. (10th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ge, Marshall; Kim, Jee‐hong; Wrobel, Bozena; Smith, Stephanie Shintani; Kochhar, Amit; Ference, Elisabeth H.
• Is Part Of: Laryngoscope. Volume 130:Number 12(2020)
• Page Start: 2785
• Page End: 2790
• Publication Date: 2020-01-10
• Subjects: Nasal valve repair -- septoplasty -- Medicare; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51005
• DOI: 10.1002/lary.28462
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0023-852X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: A bioabsorbable nasal valve implant (NVI) was introduced in 2016 as a minimally invasive solution to nasal valve collapse. Historically the introduction of less invasive procedures performable in‐office has resulted in an increase in volume. Our objective is to evaluate this trend as it relates to nasal vestibular repair, and its impact on healthcare utilization. Methods: We interrogated the Medicare Part B national database for nasal vestibular repair (CPT code: 30465), Unlisted nasal procedure (30999) and septoplasty (30520) from 2010 to 2017. Septoplasty was used as a surrogate for overall nasal procedural rate. Linear regression modeling was used to examine the changes in reported vestibular repair rate adjusting for septoplasty rate. Results: In the Medicare population, the rate of septoplasty was stable from 2010 to 2017, increasing from 26, 962 to 30, 194 at an annual rate of 1.5%. Coding for unlisted nasal procedure increased from 272 to 333 at an adjusted annual rate of 1.1% over this time period. Coding for nasal vestibular repair increased from 2026 to 5331 over this interval at an adjusted annual rate of 0.9% from 2010 to 2016 but significantly increased to 5% between 2016 to 2017 ( P < .0001). Conclusion: The reported volume of nasal vestibular repair increased significantly in the year following Food and Drug Administration approval of NVIs. In the absence of a corresponding increase in septoplasty, this temporal relationship suggests that the introduction of NVIs impacted the utilization of this procedural code. Level of Evidence: N/A Laryngoscope, 2020