Optimal integration of different types of DGs in radial distribution system by using Harris hawk optimization algorithm. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Babu, Ponnam Venkata K.; Swarnasri, K.
• Editors: Meng, Wei
• Is Part Of: Cogent engineering. Volume 7:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: Distributed Generation (DG) -- fossil fuels -- voltage profile -- power loss -- Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) -- Teaching Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO); Engineering -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals; Engineering; Technology; Periodicals; 620
• DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1823156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2331-1916

Abstract

Abstract: The probable availability of renewable power sources is unexceptionable, and the government of India is setting high goals for the use of renewable energy. Renewable distributed generation (DG) reduces the need for fossil fuels, relieve environment change, and decrease radiations of CO2 and other perfluorocarbons. DGs and capacitors are more desirable choices to balance power demand closer to the load centres than centralized power generation. Optimal position and capacity of DGs play an essential role in enhancing the performance of distribution systems in terms of system loss mitigation, voltage profile enhancement and stability concerns. This paper introduces Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) and Teaching Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) approaches for efficient distribution of different types of DGs in the radial distribution system (RDS) to enhance system loss minimization, voltage profile, yearly energy savings and decreasing the greenhouse gas emissions. The aim is to depreciate system energy losses, cost of energy losses and more reliable voltage regulation within the frame-work of RDS planning. Four different cases are considered to assess the suggested algorithms. Simulations are carried out on IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus test RDSs. The preponderance of the recommended approaches has been shown by analysing the results with techniques available in the literature. The comparison is made based on the power losses and voltage profile of RDS. The outcomes reveal that a significant decrease in power loss, enrichment of the voltage profile across the network and exactness of the suggested methods.