Measured Multipoint Ultra-High b-Value Diffusion MRI in the Assessment of MRI-Detected Prostate Lesions. Issue 2 (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tavakoli, Anoshirwan Andrej; Kuder, Tristan Anselm; Tichy, Diana; Radtke, Jan Philipp; Görtz, Magdalena; Schütz, Viktoria; Stenzinger, Albrecht; Hohenfellner, Markus; Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter; Bonekamp, David
• Is Part Of: Investigative radiology. Volume 56:Issue 2(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: prostate cancer -- magnetic resonance imaging -- diffusion -- neoplasms -- diagnostic imaging; Diagnosis, Radioscopic -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000712
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-9996

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess quantitative ultra-high b-value (UHB) diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–derived parameters in comparison to standard clinical apparent diffusion coefficient (SD-ADC-2b-1000, SD-ADC-2b-1500) for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as Gleason Grade Group greater than or equal to 2. Materials and Methods: Seventy-three patients who underwent 3-T prostate MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging acquired at b = 50/500/1000/1500s/mm 2 and b = 100/500/1000/1500/2250/3000/4000 s/mm 2 were included. Magnetic resonance lesions were segmented manually on individual sequences, then matched to targeted transrectal ultrasonography/MRI fusion biopsies. Monoexponential 2-point and multipoint fits of standard diffusion and of UHB diffusion were calculated with incremental b-values. Furthermore, a kurtosis fit with parameters D app and K app with incremental b-values was obtained. Each parameter was examined for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer using bootstrapped receiver operating characteristics and decision curve analysis. Parameter models were compared using Vuong test. Results: Fifty of 73 men (age, 66 years [interquartile range, 61–72]; prostate-specific antigen, 6.6 ng/mL [interquartile range, 5–9.7]) had 64 MRI-detected lesions. The performance of SD-ADC-2b-1000 (area under the curve, 0.82) and SD-ADC-2b-1500 (area under the curve, 0.82) was not statistically different ( P = 0.99), with SD-ADC-2b-1500 selected as reference. Compared with the reference model, none of the 19 tested logistic regression parameter models including multipoint and 2-point UHB-ADC, D app, and K app with incremental b-values of up to 4000 s/mm 2 outperformed SD-ADC-2b-1500 (all P 's > 0.05). Decision curve analysis confirmed these results indicating no higher net benefit for UHB parameters in comparison to SD-ADC-2b-1500 in the clinically important range from 3% to 20% of cancer threshold probability. Net reduction analysis showed no reduction of MR lesions requiring biopsy. Conclusions: Despite evaluation of a large b-value range and inclusion of 2-point, multipoint, and kurtosis models, none of the parameters provided better predictive performance than standard 2-point ADC measurements using b-values 50/1000 or 50/1500. Our results suggest that most of the diagnostic benefits available in diffusion MRI are already represented in an ADC composed of one low and one 1000 to 1500 s/mm 2 b-value. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text.