DIR-based models to predict weekly anatomical changes in head and neck cancer proton therapy. (7th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Ying; McGowan Holloway, Stacey; Zoë Wilson, Megan; Alshaikhi, Jailan; Tan, Wenyong; Royle, Gary; Bär, Esther
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 67:Number 9(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05-07
• Subjects: anatomical model -- uncertainty evaluation -- proton therapy; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5fe2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: Objective . We proposed two anatomical models for head and neck patients to predict anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy. Approach . Deformable image registration was used to build two anatomical models: (1) the average model (AM) simulated systematic progressive changes across the patient cohort; (2) the refined individual model (RIM) used a patient's CT images acquired during treatment to update the prediction for each individual patient. Planning CTs and weekly CTs were used from 20 nasopharynx patients. This dataset included 15 training patients and 5 test patients. For each test patient, a spot scanning proton plan was created. Models were evaluated using CT number differences, contours, proton spot location deviations and dose distributions. Main results . If no model was used, the CT number difference between the planning CT and the repeat CT at week 6 of treatment was on average 128.9 Hounsfield Units (HU) over the test population. This can be reduced to 115.5 HU using the AM, and to 110.5 HU using the RIM3 (RIM, updated at week (3). When the predicted contours from the models were used, the average mean surface distance of parotid glands can be reduced from 1.98 (no model) to 1.16 mm (AM) and 1.19 mm (RIM3 ) at week 6. Using the proton spot range, the average anatomical uncertainty over the test population reduced from 4.47 ± 1.23 (no model) to 2.41 ± 1.12 mm (AM), and 1.89 ± 0.96 mm (RIM3 ). Based on the gamma analysis, the average gamma index over the test patients was improved from 93.87 ± 2.48 % (no model) to 96.16 ± 1.84% (RIM3 ) at week 6. Significance . The AM and the RIM both demonstrated the ability to predict anatomical changes during the treatment. The RIM can gradually refine the prediction of anatomical changes based on the AM. The proton beam spots provided an accurate and effective way for uncertainty evaluation.