Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms. (2nd May 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barkana, Yaniv; Bakshi, Erez; Goldich, Yakov; Morad, Yair; Kaplan, Audrey; Avni, Isaac; Zadok, David
• Other Names: Muñoz-Negrete Francisco J. Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: TheScientificWorldjournal. Volume 2012(2012)
• Publication Date: 2012-05-02
• Subjects: Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; 505
• DOI: 10.1100/2012/821802
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2356-6140

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose : To compare the 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast visual field programs in patients with glaucoma. Methods : We enrolled 26 patients with open angle glaucoma with involvement of at least one paracentral location on 24-2 SITA-standard field test. Each subject performed 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast tests. Within 2 months this sequence of tests was repeated. Results : SITA-fast was 30% shorter than SITA-standard (5.5 ± 1.1 vs 7.9 ± 1.1 minutes, P < 0.001 ). Mean MD was statistically significantly higher for SITA-standard compared with SITA-fast at first visit (Δ = 0.3 dB, P = 0.017 ) but not second visit. Inter-visit difference in MD or in number of depressed points was not significant for both programs. Bland-Altman analysis showed that clinically significant variations can exist in individual instances between the 2 programs and between repeat tests with the same program. Conclusions : The 10-2 SITA-fast algorithm is significantly shorter than SITA-standard. The two programs have similar long-term variability. Average same-visit between-program and same-program between-visit sensitivity results were similar for the study population, but clinically significant variability was observed for some individual test pairs. Group inter- and intra-program test results may be comparable, but in the management of the individual patient field change should be verified by repeat testing.