Embryo donation or embryo adoption? Conceptual and normative issues. (10th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hallich, Oliver
• Other Names: Kraemer Felicitas guestEditor.; Hallich Oliver guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Bioethics. Volume 33:Number 6(2019)
• Page Start: 653
• Page End: 660
• Publication Date: 2018-10-10
• Subjects: adoption -- embryo donation -- parental responsibility; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.957
• DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12515
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9702

Abstract

Abstract: A central question in the ethical debate on the practice of relinquishing in vitro fertilization surplus embryos for family building is whether we ought to think of it more in terms of donating these embryos or in terms of having them adopted. Deciding between these two alternatives is more than a matter of mere terminology. It has an impact on normative questions, e.g., on the question of what criteria for parent selection ought to be applied to the recipients of the embryos, and on the moral evaluation of the act of 'donating' the embryo or 'having it adopted'. In this article, I defend the view that we should conceptualize the relinquishment of spare embryos according to the adoption model, not as a donation. Section 2 sketches the outline of the argument by making clear how we may ground a defense of the adoption model in a theory of parental responsibility without implicitly elevating the moral status of the embryo. Section 3 contains a preliminary defense of the adoption model that draws on geneticism as what seems to me the most persuasive theory of parental responsibility. In section 4, I examine three objections to geneticism and either rebut them or, insofar as they are justified, try to accommodate them into my view. In section 5, I point out some features that distinguish embryo adoption from the adoption of (born) children. I contend, however, that these differences are compatible with the adoption model. Section 6 is concerned with the normative ramifications of this view.