Intrinsic Contributions of 2′‐Hydroxyl to the Hydration of Nucleosides at the Monomeric Level. Issue 71 (19th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Zheng; Liu, Jiang; Zhang, Yanan; Qi, Jiajia; Han, Xianglong; Zhao, Xuefeng; Bai, Ding; Zhao, Hang; Chen, Qianming
• Is Part Of: Chemistry. Volume 26:Issue 71(2020)
• Page Start: 17046
• Page End: 17055
• Publication Date: 2020-10-19
• Subjects: crystal growth -- hydration -- hydrogen bonds -- nucleosides -- water chemistry; Chemistry -- Periodicals; 540
• DOI: 10.1002/chem.202002835
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0947-6539

Abstract

Abstract: Although many reports have revealed structural differences between DNA and RNA at the polymeric level, there are no comparative studies with 2′‐deoxyribonucleoside and ribonucleoside to explore the role of the 2′‐OH group at the monomeric level under the same conditions. Inspired by this, herein, the intrinsic contributions of the 2′‐OH group in the nucleoside have been systematically investigated by directly solving the single‐crystal structures of 2′‐deoxy‐2‐aminoadenosine (1 ), 2‐aminoadenosine (2 ), and 2‐aminoarabinofuranosyladenine (3 ) in water. The 2′‐OH group not only influenced the conformation and base‐pair pattern of the single‐nucleoside molecule, but also played a fundamental role in the entire supramolecular structure. Interestingly, compound 1, which did not contain the 2′‐OH group, displayed strong hydration, whereas 2 and 3 (with the 2′‐OH group in the opposite direction) exhibited no hydration, which was completely different from that observed in nucleic acids. Meanwhile, compound 1 trapped water molecules to form unique trihydrol moieties, which further served as the backbone to construct the simplest double‐chain DNA‐like structures. To this end, to investigate the effect of the biological environment on these unique structures, the solvent was changed from water to phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). Surprisingly, such a subtle adjustment led to entirely different superstructures, consisting of 2D lamellar structures in water and 3D porous structures in PBS. These large morphological differences could be attributed to delicate ion hydration, which was also confirmed through variable‐temperature X‐ray analysis, SEM, and intermolecular interaction energy calculations. In summary, this study comprehensively investigated the intrinsic contributions of 2′‐hydroxyl to the hydration of nucleosides at the monomeric level; this is helpful to further understand the differences in DNA/RNA and the impact of their surrounding environment. Abstract : Characterizing the backbone : The 2′‐hydroxyl group is the origin of profound structural and dynamic differences between RNA and DNA. By solving and comparing the single‐crystal structures of 2′‐deoxy‐2‐aminoadenosine and 2‐aminoadenosine, this work aims to interpret the intrinsic contributions of the 2′‐hydroxyl group in nucleosides at the monomeric level.