FragSAD: A database of diversity and species abundance distributions from habitat fragments. Issue 12 (1st October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- FragSAD: A database of diversity and species abundance distributions from habitat fragments. Issue 12 (1st October 2019)
- Main Title:
- FragSAD: A database of diversity and species abundance distributions from habitat fragments
- Authors:
- Chase, Jonathan M.
Liebergesell, Mario
Sagouis, Alban
May, Felix
Blowes, Shane A.
Berg, Åke
Bernard, Enrico
Brosi, Berry J.
Cadotte, Marc W.
Cayuela, Luis
Chiarello, Adriano G.
Cosson, Jean‐Francois
Cresswell, Will
Dami, Filibus Danjuma
Dauber, Jens
Dickman, Chris R.
Didham, Raphael K.
Edwards, David P.
Farneda, Fábio Z.
Gavish, Yoni
Gonçalves‐Souza, Thiago
Guadagnin, Demetrio Luis
Henry, Mickaël
López‐Baucells, Adrià
Kappes, Heike
Mac Nally, Ralph
Manu, Shiiwua
Martensen, Alexandre Camargo
McCollin, Duncan
Meyer, Christoph F. J.
Neckel‐Oliveira, Selvino
Nogueira, André
Pons, Jean‐Marc
Raheem, Dinarzarde C.
Ramos, Flavio Nunes
Rocha, Ricardo
Sam, Katerina
Slade, Eleanor
Stireman, John O.
Struebig, Matthew J.
Vasconcelos, Heraldo
Ziv, Yaron
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Habitat destruction is the single greatest anthropogenic threat to biodiversity. Decades of research on this issue have led to the accumulation of hundreds of data sets comparing species assemblages in larger, intact, habitats to smaller, more fragmented, habitats. Despite this, little synthesis or consensus has been achieved, primarily because of non‐standardized sampling methodology and analyses of notoriously scale‐dependent response variables (i.e., species richness). To be able to compare and contrast the results of habitat fragmentation on species' assemblages, it is necessary to have the underlying data on species abundances and sampling intensity, so that standardization can be achieved. To accomplish this, we systematically searched the literature for studies where abundances of species in assemblages (of any taxa) were sampled from many habitat patches that varied in size. From these, we extracted data from several studies, and contacted authors of studies where appropriate data were collected but not published, giving us 117 studies that compared species assemblages among habitat fragments that varied in area. Less than one‐half (41) of studies came from tropical forests of Central and South America, but there were many studies from temperate forests and grasslands from all continents except Antarctica. Fifty‐four of the studies were on invertebrates (mostly insects), but there were several studies on plants (15), birds (16), mammals (19), and reptilesAbstract: Habitat destruction is the single greatest anthropogenic threat to biodiversity. Decades of research on this issue have led to the accumulation of hundreds of data sets comparing species assemblages in larger, intact, habitats to smaller, more fragmented, habitats. Despite this, little synthesis or consensus has been achieved, primarily because of non‐standardized sampling methodology and analyses of notoriously scale‐dependent response variables (i.e., species richness). To be able to compare and contrast the results of habitat fragmentation on species' assemblages, it is necessary to have the underlying data on species abundances and sampling intensity, so that standardization can be achieved. To accomplish this, we systematically searched the literature for studies where abundances of species in assemblages (of any taxa) were sampled from many habitat patches that varied in size. From these, we extracted data from several studies, and contacted authors of studies where appropriate data were collected but not published, giving us 117 studies that compared species assemblages among habitat fragments that varied in area. Less than one‐half (41) of studies came from tropical forests of Central and South America, but there were many studies from temperate forests and grasslands from all continents except Antarctica. Fifty‐four of the studies were on invertebrates (mostly insects), but there were several studies on plants (15), birds (16), mammals (19), and reptiles and amphibians (13). We also collected qualitative information on the length of time since fragmentation. With data on total and relative abundances (and identities) of species, sampling effort, and affiliated meta‐data about the study sites, these data can be used to more definitively test hypotheses about the role of habitat fragmentation in altering patterns of biodiversity. There are no copyright restrictions. Please cite this data paper and the associated Dryad data set if the data are used in publications. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Ecology. Volume 100:Issue 12(2019)
- Journal:
- Ecology
- Issue:
- Volume 100:Issue 12(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 100, Issue 12 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 100
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0100-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-01
- Subjects:
- disturbance -- habitat fragmentation -- habitat loss -- species abundance distribution -- species–area relationship -- species richness
Ecology -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Écologie -- Périodiques
Ecologie
Écologie
Écologie animale
Écologie végétale
Ecology
Periodicals
577.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jstor.org/journals/00129658.html ↗
http://www.esajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-archive&issn=0012-9658 ↗
http://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1939-9170/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ecy.2861 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0012-9658
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3650.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21910.xml