Towards the targeted assessment of relevant problems: Optimization of the distress Thermometer for adult neuro‐oncological patients. Issue 12 (16th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goebel, Simone; Knuth, Carina; Damm, Matthias; Linden, Daniel; Coburger, Jan; Ringel, Florian; Tabatabai, Ghazaleh; Mehdorn, Maximilian; Renovanz, Mirjam
• Other Names: Irwin Kelly E. guestEditor.; Loscalzo Matthew L. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Psycho-oncology. Volume 29:Issue 12(2020)
• Page Start: 2057
• Page End: 2066
• Publication Date: 2020-10-16
• Subjects: brain cancer -- brain tumour -- distress thermometer -- psycho‐oncological screening -- psycho‐oncology -- psychosocial screening -- targeted assessment; Cancer -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- psychology -- Periodicals; 616.9940019
• DOI: 10.1002/pon.5564
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1057-9249

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Generic psychosocial screening tools may not reflect the unique symptom profile of brain tumour patients (BTPs). The aim was to adapt the problem list of the distress thermometer (DT) for BTPs. Methods: First, items of low relevance for BTPs were identified on basis of retrospective analyses. Second, relevant yet missing problems were identified via an extensive literature search, qualitative interviews with BTPs and experts, as well as an online expert survey. The resulting raw version of the adapted problem list in BTPs was subsequently pretested. Results: In the first part, data of n = 657 BTPs were analysed. Twelve items (20%) were excluded in this step as they proved to be less relevant for BTPs (i.e., items were endorsed by less than 10% and without significant correlations to patients' DT score). In the second part, qualitative interviews and the online survey with 102 professionals led to the addition of 21 new and the modification and condensation of 17 relevant problems specific for BTPs. This adapted list was than successfully pretested in n = 19 patients, leading to the 'distress thermometer brain tumour problem list' (DT‐BT), consisting of 42 relevant problems. Conclusion: The adapted problem list for the DT particularly reflects the neurological and psychosocial burden of an intracranial tumour and allows for the targeted assessment of the specific burdens and needs of BTPs. Our revised version of the DTs problem list (DT‐BT) should in the next step be widely validated in multinational samples.