307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis. (26th November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis. (26th November 2018)
- Main Title:
- 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
- Authors:
- Weihe, Rachel
Burton, Douglas
Jackson, Sean
Reeves, Alan
Rotich, Duncan
He, Jianghua
El Atrouni, Wissam - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Current approaches for diagnosis of native spondylodiskitis are variable, as is the yield of image guided spinal biopsy. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including adults determined to have native spondylodiskitis at our institution from January 2007 through July 2017. Inclusion criteria were imaging suggestive of spondylodiskitis, with either positive blood culture and/or a spinal biopsy culture or histopathology. Those with historical diagnosis or surgical site infections were excluded. Histopathology was the gold standard test for sensitivity/specificity calculation. Univariate logistic regression was used to predict positive biopsy culture. Results: A total of 221 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which 203 (91.8%) had blood cultures done (112/203 positive, 55.2%), and 173 (78.2%) had spinal biopsy done of which 113 (65.0%) had received antibiotics within the preceding 2 weeks and 63 (36.4%) had positive culture. Forty-three bone specimens were cultured, and six (13.9%) were positive, while 136 disk specimens were cultured, and 58 (42.6%) were positive. There were 84 (48.5%) biopsies with histopathology performed on either bone or disk specimens, of which 47 (55.9%) were diagnostic. The sensitivity of bone culture was 27.3%, with a specificity of 91.7%. The sensitivity of disk culture was 52.6%, with a specificity of 75.0%. A single biopsy episode sensitivity was 48.9%, and specificity was 80.8%. A total of 23 (13.4%) patients hadAbstract: Background: Current approaches for diagnosis of native spondylodiskitis are variable, as is the yield of image guided spinal biopsy. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including adults determined to have native spondylodiskitis at our institution from January 2007 through July 2017. Inclusion criteria were imaging suggestive of spondylodiskitis, with either positive blood culture and/or a spinal biopsy culture or histopathology. Those with historical diagnosis or surgical site infections were excluded. Histopathology was the gold standard test for sensitivity/specificity calculation. Univariate logistic regression was used to predict positive biopsy culture. Results: A total of 221 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which 203 (91.8%) had blood cultures done (112/203 positive, 55.2%), and 173 (78.2%) had spinal biopsy done of which 113 (65.0%) had received antibiotics within the preceding 2 weeks and 63 (36.4%) had positive culture. Forty-three bone specimens were cultured, and six (13.9%) were positive, while 136 disk specimens were cultured, and 58 (42.6%) were positive. There were 84 (48.5%) biopsies with histopathology performed on either bone or disk specimens, of which 47 (55.9%) were diagnostic. The sensitivity of bone culture was 27.3%, with a specificity of 91.7%. The sensitivity of disk culture was 52.6%, with a specificity of 75.0%. A single biopsy episode sensitivity was 48.9%, and specificity was 80.8%. A total of 23 (13.4%) patients had repeat biopsies (10 bone, 14 disk), five of which had positive cultures (21.7%). On univariate logistic regression, only a positive blood culture was predictive of a positive biopsy culture (odds ratio (OR) 13.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97–86.81, P = 0.007). Disk culture had a higher yield than bone culture (OR 2.29; CI 0.91–5.73, P = 0.077) and prior antibiotics decreased the yield (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02–1.21, P = 0.078). Conclusion: The combination of histopathology and cultures including both bone and disk from spinal biopsies improve the diagnostic yield of native spondylodiskitis. Some patients require repeat biopsy. Disclosures: All authors: No reported disclosures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 5(2018)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 5(2018)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0005-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S124
- Page End:
- S125
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11-26
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.318 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2328-8957
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21892.xml