1789. Inpatient Penicillin Skin Testing: Outcomes From a Propensity-Matched Case–Control Study. (26th November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 1789. Inpatient Penicillin Skin Testing: Outcomes From a Propensity-Matched Case–Control Study. (26th November 2018)
- Main Title:
- 1789. Inpatient Penicillin Skin Testing: Outcomes From a Propensity-Matched Case–Control Study
- Authors:
- Sarubbi, Christina
Wrenn, Rebekah
Turner, Nicholas
Kleris, Renee
Seidelman, Jessica
Lugar, Patricia
Radojicic, Cristine
Moehring, Rebekah W
Anderson, Deverick J - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Nearly 10% of patients report an allergy to penicillin, yet fewer than 10% are confirmed to have a true allergy. Reported allergy frequently leads to the use of costly, broad-spectrum or less-effective antibiotics. We launched a penicillin skin testing (PST) service offering real-time skin testing for inpatients. Here we present clinical outcomes for the first 80 consecutively tested cases compared with propensity-matched controls. Methods: PST was performed on 80 adults with a reported penicillin allergy admitted to Duke University Hospital between November 2016 and March 2018. A logistic regression model predicting PST receipt was developed using a cohort of penicillin-allergic, untested adults. Covariates included age, gender, diagnosis, and Charlson co-morbidity index. Using this model, the PST cases were propensity-matched 1:1 with untested, penicillin-allergic controls admitted in the preceding year (October 2015–October 2016). Rates of first-line antibiotic receipt were compared between PST cases and their propensity-matched controls. Results: PST cases and controls had similar demographics, reported allergies, diagnoses, and co-morbidities. Cases were more likely to receive a first-line antibiotic (83% vs. 57%, P = 0.003, Table 1). Rates of clinical cure were similar between groups. Ninety-day recurrence and C. difficile infection were numerically higher in the untested group but did not reach statistical significance. A single allergic reactionAbstract: Background: Nearly 10% of patients report an allergy to penicillin, yet fewer than 10% are confirmed to have a true allergy. Reported allergy frequently leads to the use of costly, broad-spectrum or less-effective antibiotics. We launched a penicillin skin testing (PST) service offering real-time skin testing for inpatients. Here we present clinical outcomes for the first 80 consecutively tested cases compared with propensity-matched controls. Methods: PST was performed on 80 adults with a reported penicillin allergy admitted to Duke University Hospital between November 2016 and March 2018. A logistic regression model predicting PST receipt was developed using a cohort of penicillin-allergic, untested adults. Covariates included age, gender, diagnosis, and Charlson co-morbidity index. Using this model, the PST cases were propensity-matched 1:1 with untested, penicillin-allergic controls admitted in the preceding year (October 2015–October 2016). Rates of first-line antibiotic receipt were compared between PST cases and their propensity-matched controls. Results: PST cases and controls had similar demographics, reported allergies, diagnoses, and co-morbidities. Cases were more likely to receive a first-line antibiotic (83% vs. 57%, P = 0.003, Table 1). Rates of clinical cure were similar between groups. Ninety-day recurrence and C. difficile infection were numerically higher in the untested group but did not reach statistical significance. A single allergic reaction (rash upon receipt of a cephalosporin) occurred in the PST group. Conclusion: Penicillin skin-testing significantly increased the proportion of patients receiving first-line antibiotics. While rates of recurrence and C. difficile infection were lower for skin-tested patients, these differences did not reach statistical significance. As this study was not expressly powered to detect such differences, we plan to reassess these outcomes once we have accrued a sufficiently large cohort of tested patients. Disclosures: All authors: No reported disclosures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 5(2018)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 5(2018)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0005-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S507
- Page End:
- S507
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11-26
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1445 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2328-8957
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21891.xml