Validation of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD): Neuropsychology/early detection of cognitive decline with neuropsychological tests. (7th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alexopoulos, Panagiotis; Skondra, Maria; Charalampopoulou, Marina; Aligianni, Souzana; Kontogianni, Evangelia; Lentzari, Iliana; Vratsista, Aikaterini; Kliegel, Matthias; Politis, Antonis
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 16(2020)Supplement 6
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-12-07
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.041461
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Cognitive assessment is necessary for diagnosing cognitive impairment. In epidemiologic surveys and genetic family studies cognitive tests that can be administered over the telephone are valuable tools. The Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) is a brief instrument for capturing interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, with the advantage of covering more cognitive domains than traditional screening tools such as the Mini‐mental State Examination (MMSE), as well as differentiating between individual performance levels in healthy older adults. Here, we report first evidence of the utility of the COGTEL in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Method: The COGTEL was translated into Greek. Thereafter a bilingual expert not familiar with the original COGTEL made a back translation into English. The new version was very similar to the original one. The study refers to 30 and 22 patients with MCI and dementia due to AD, respectively. They fulfilled the international NIA‐AA diagnostic criteria. The study included 45 cognitively normal elderly individuals, too. The COGTEL was compared to the conventional modified Mini Mental State Examination (3MS). They were validated against an expert diagnosis based on a comprehensive diagnostic workup which included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical analysis was performed using the receiver‐operator‐characteristics (ROC) method. Result: The COGTEL outperformed the 3MS in the distinction between cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with MCI (Area under the curve, AUC: 0.94 vs. 0.89), whilst both instruments were excellent in identifying patients suffering from dementia due to AD (AUC in both cases 0.99). Conclusion: The COGTEL is a short, practical and reliable telephone test for the identification of both MCI and dementia due to AD. It can serve as a useful instrument in studying normal cognition and cognitive impairment in aging in both clinical diagnostics and research projects. The lack of difference between COGTEL and 3MS in their capacity to detect dementia due to AD is probably attributable to the fact that healthy aging can in most cases be unambiguously distinguished from dementia due AD, while the distinction between MCI and healthy aging is more ambitious.