FDA Approval Summary: Abemaciclib With Endocrine Therapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer. Issue 11 (10th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Royce, Melanie; Osgood, Christy; Mulkey, Flora; Bloomquist, Erik; Pierce, William F.; Roy, Arpita; Kalavar, Shyam; Ghosh, Soma; Philip, Reena; Rizvi, Fatima; Mixter, Bronwyn D.; Tang, Shenghui; Pazdur, Richard; Beaver, Julia A.; Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical oncology. Volume 40:Issue 11(2022)
• Page Start: 1155
• Page End: 1162
• Publication Date: 2022-04-10
• Subjects: Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Periodicals; Oncology; Medical Oncology; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Périodiques; Cancérologie; Cancer; Oncology; Oncologia; Càncer; Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02742
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0732-183X

Abstract

Abstract : PURPOSE: The US Food and Drug Administration approved abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative, node-positive, early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of recurrence and a Ki-67 score ≥ 20%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The approval was based on monarchE, a phase III, open-label, 2-cohort, multicenter trial of patients with EBC randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib plus ET (n = 2, 808) or ET alone (n = 2, 829). Abemaciclib was given at 150 mg orally twice daily for 2 years. RESULTS: Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the intent-to-treat population was statistically significant at the second IDFS interim analysis (IA; March 2020; hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI], 0.747 [0.598 to 0.932]; P = .0096); however, only 12.5% of patients had completed adjuvant therapy, and the HR for overall survival (OS) was > 1. A prespecified, controlled analysis of IDFS in patients with Ki-67 ≥ 20% in cohort 1 was statistically significant at the final IDFS analysis (July 2020; HR [95% CI], 0.643 [0.475 to 0.872]; P = .0042). At the first OS IA (April 2021), the majority of patients had completed adjuvant therapy, IDFS remained consistent, and potential detriment in OS was not observed for this subgroup (HR [95% CI], 0.767 [0.511 to 1.152]). The HR for OS in the intent-to-treat population at OS IA remained > 1 (HR [95% CI], 1.091 [0.818 to 1.455]). More patients in the abemaciclib plus ET arm experienced treatment emergent adverse events (all grades 98.4% v 88.8%, grade 3 ≥ 49.7% v 16.3%). CONCLUSION: The approval of abemaciclib in adjuvant EBC was limited to patients with high risk of recurrence and Ki-67 ≥ 20%, given their favorable benefit:risk with a statistically significant IDFS advantage and no observed detriment on survival.