OTHR-12. Incidentalomas; should benign, indeterminate MRI findings be discussed at the paediatric neuro-oncology MDT. (3rd June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Large, Alexandra; Picton, Sue
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 24(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: i149
• Page End: i149
• Publication Date: 2022-06-03
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac079.551
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In 2020, 503 patients were discussed at the weekly neuro-oncology MDT meeting, at a UK tertiary paediatric hospital. This was a 50% increase from 2016. Anecdotally, an increased number of non-tumours were being discussed. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Paediatric Neuro-oncology MDT is consistent with follow up of benign, incidental findings on MRI scan and whether these lesions become significant.METHODS: MDT discussion notes reviewed for all incidental and benign MRI head findings between 05/09/18 and 02/09/20.RESULTS: 59 MRI head lesions, that were deemed to be both incidental and benign were discussed at the MDT. 44% of referrals were from the local hospital; this may be due to availability of the MDT or complexity of the patient cohort. Findings discussed included pineal cysts (24), arachnoid cysts (3), epidermoid cysts (1), pituitary lesions (4) and other indeterminate lesions or signal change (27). The majority of children received serial MRI imaging after MDT. There were large inconsistencies in the follow-up interval recommended, even within similar pathologies. For example, pineal cysts follow up ranged from no repeat imaging to multiple repeat scans with 6 and 12 month intervals. 'Complex' cysts were more likely to receive follow up but there is little consensus between radiologists about criteria for a 'complex cyst'. None of the lesions reviewed changed significantly over time. Perhaps most strikingly, only 2/27 of the 'indeterminate lesions' have been discharged from the MDT. CONCLUSIONS: As clinical reasoning is seldom recorded in reports or MDT discussion notes the reasons for different surveillance recommendations is difficult to ascertain retrospectively. However, as MRI scans become more readily available incidental and being findings will increase, potentially putting great pressure on an already stretched service. Serial MRI imaging also creates unnecessary anxiety for both the child and their family.