ATRT-09. Outcome and therapeutic interventions in relapsed and refractory ATRT – The EU-RHAB perspective. (3rd June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- ATRT-09. Outcome and therapeutic interventions in relapsed and refractory ATRT – The EU-RHAB perspective. (3rd June 2022)
- Main Title:
- ATRT-09. Outcome and therapeutic interventions in relapsed and refractory ATRT – The EU-RHAB perspective
- Authors:
- Steinbügl, Mona
Nemes, Karolina
Gruhle, Miriam
Johann, Pascal
Gil-da-Costa, Maria Joao
Ebinger, Martin
Sehested, Astrid
Hauser, Peter
Reinhard, Harald
Hettmer, Simone
Jakob, Marcus
Rutkowski, Stefan
Driever, Pablo Hernáiz
Fleischhack, Gudrun
Kerl, Kornelius
Witt, Olaf
Gerss, Joachim
Siebert, Reiner
Schüller, Ulrich
Hasselblatt, Martin
Frühwald, Michael C - Abstract:
- Abstract: Currently an internationally accepted consensus treatment for relapsed/refractory ATRT is missing. Little is known about relapse patterns, prognostic factors and outcome. In a recently published cohort of 143 ATRTs from the EU-RHAB registry, progression on therapy or relapse occurred in 64% (n=91). Previously published strategies for treatment failure have been restricted to individual, mostly clinically guided, attempts or early phase trials with limited sample sizes. We present a cohort of 55 patients with relapsed/refractory ATRT identified between 2015 and 2021 (total ATRT recruited n=147). Median age was 19 months; in 27.3% (n=15) a germline mutation was identified. A total of 43/55 tumors were subgrouped [60.5% SHH (n=26), 14.0% MYC (n=6), 23.3% TYR (n=10), one patient with SHH+TYR]. Salvage therapy was applied to 83.6% (46/55). Sixty therapy attempts with 17 different regimens subclassified into conventional chemotherapy, epigenetic, targeted or metronomic therapy were applied to 40/55 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 20±1.8 weeks following the first event, median time to progression was 11±1.8 weeks. 12 months OS was 23.1%. No significant differences in survival were noted between different molecular subgroups; neither was germline mutation in SMARCB1 prognostic. Patients <12 months (n=9;16.4%) had a significantly reduced OS compared to older patients. (9±6.0wks vs. 22±3.2wks, p<0.05) Those who received therapy according to metronomic approachesAbstract: Currently an internationally accepted consensus treatment for relapsed/refractory ATRT is missing. Little is known about relapse patterns, prognostic factors and outcome. In a recently published cohort of 143 ATRTs from the EU-RHAB registry, progression on therapy or relapse occurred in 64% (n=91). Previously published strategies for treatment failure have been restricted to individual, mostly clinically guided, attempts or early phase trials with limited sample sizes. We present a cohort of 55 patients with relapsed/refractory ATRT identified between 2015 and 2021 (total ATRT recruited n=147). Median age was 19 months; in 27.3% (n=15) a germline mutation was identified. A total of 43/55 tumors were subgrouped [60.5% SHH (n=26), 14.0% MYC (n=6), 23.3% TYR (n=10), one patient with SHH+TYR]. Salvage therapy was applied to 83.6% (46/55). Sixty therapy attempts with 17 different regimens subclassified into conventional chemotherapy, epigenetic, targeted or metronomic therapy were applied to 40/55 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 20±1.8 weeks following the first event, median time to progression was 11±1.8 weeks. 12 months OS was 23.1%. No significant differences in survival were noted between different molecular subgroups; neither was germline mutation in SMARCB1 prognostic. Patients <12 months (n=9;16.4%) had a significantly reduced OS compared to older patients. (9±6.0wks vs. 22±3.2wks, p<0.05) Those who received therapy according to metronomic approaches such as MEMMAT (8/55;14.5%) survived longer than patients treated with other regimens, including epigenetic and targeted therapy. (72±36.8wks vs. 25±6.2wks, p<0.05) Our data provide valuable insights into a vulnerable group of patients deserving evidence based clinical management and access to clinical trials of all phases. Prospectively we aim to merge the results with data from other, international cohorts to generate more robust and valuable results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 24(2022)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 24(2022)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0024-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- i4
- Page End:
- i4
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-03
- Subjects:
- Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/noac079.008 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21906.xml