Balancing group deviation & balancing energy costs due to the provision of frequency containment reserve with a battery storage system in Germany. (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koltermann, Lucas; Jacqué, Kevin; Figgener, Jan; Zurmühlen, Sebastian; Uwe Sauer, Dirk
• Is Part Of: International journal of electrical power & energy systems. Volume 142:Part B(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: Large scale battery storage -- Frequency containment reserve -- Imbalance settlement pricing -- Balancing group deviation; Electrical engineering -- Periodicals; Electric power systems -- Periodicals; Électrotechnique -- Périodiques; Réseaux électriques (Énergie) -- Périodiques; Electric power systems; Electrical engineering; Periodicals; 621.3
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108327
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0142-0615

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Cost from imbalance settlement pricing when providing frequency containment reserve. Simulation of providing frequency containment reserve in different use cases. Comparison of simulation data with field data from a large-scale battery storage. Abstract: The energy transition in the electrical energy supply sector is leading to a steadily increasing share of fluctuating renewable energy sources in the power grid. Thus, control reserves such as frequency containment reserve are gaining in importance and need further investigation. In Germany, the power grid is divided into balancing groups, in which supply and demand must be balanced out. The provision of frequency containment reserve, creates an imbalance in the respective balancing group depending on the grid condition. However, this energetic imbalance and the resulting costs for the balancing group manager are further to be quantified. This work provides a simulation model that examines the energetic imbalances resulting from the provision of frequency containment reserve. We validate the simulation results with field-data from the operation of a 6 MW battery storage system and derive the resulting cost for the energy imbalances. In addition, flexibility options for batteries given by the regulatory framework in form of the degrees of freedom are evaluated. The results show, that the degrees of freedom enable a battery storage operator to additionally charge up to 8.68 MWh/MW frequency containment reserve per month or dis-charge up to 9 MWh/MW frequency containment reserve per month on average. The additional profits from the German imbalance settlement price vary on average between 302 € and 1, 068 € per MW frequency containment reserve per month. In Conclusion, the field-data confirm the simulation data in terms of energy deviations in the balancing group due to the provision of FCR. Over the period of one month, the deviation usually leads to a cost-related advantage for the balancing group manager. The provision of frequency containment reserve as a grid service can therefore be seen as a positive gain for a balancing group. © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.