Can phase change materials in building insulation improve self-consumption of residential rooftop solar? An Australian case study. (June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rahimpour, Zahra; Verbič, Gregor; Chapman, Archie C.
• Is Part Of: Renewable energy. Volume 192(2022)
• Page Start: 24
• Page End: 34
• Publication Date: 2022-06
• Subjects: Building thermal inertia -- Demand response -- Electricity cost-saving -- Home energy management -- Phase change material -- PV self-Consumption; Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals; Power resources -- Periodicals; Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques; Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques; 333.794
• DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.085
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-1481

Abstract

Abstract: This work investigates the extent to which phase change material (PCM) in the building's envelope can be used as an alternative to battery storage systems to increase self-consumption of rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) generation. In particular, we explore the electricity cost-savings and increase in PV self-consumption that can be achieved by using PCMs and the operation of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system optimised by a home energy management system (HEMS). In more detail, we consider a HEMS with an HVAC system, rooftop PV, and a PCM layer integrated into the building envelope. The objective of the HEMS optimisation is to minimise electricity costs while maximising PV self-consumption and maintaining the indoor building temperature in a preferred comfort range. Solving this problem is challenging due to PCM's nonlinear characteristics, and using methods that can deal with the resulting non-convexity of the optimisation problem, like dynamic programming is computationally expensive. Therefore, we use multi-timescale approximate dynamic programming (MADP) that we developed in our earlier work to explore a number of Australian PCM scenarios. Specifically, we analyse a large number of residential buildings across five Australian capital cities. We find that using PCM can reduce annual electricity costs by between 10.6% in Brisbane and 19% in Adelaide. However, somewhat surprisingly, using PCM reduces PV self-consumption by between 1.5% in Brisbane and 2.7% in Perth.