P265 Current UK wide use of the BASMI outcome measure in axial spondyloarthritis: an AStretch survey. (23rd April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weight, Kate; Gregory, William J; Chambers, Hannah; Clarke, Emily; Daly, Matthew; Davie, Alasdair; Elkins, Jenny C; Gaikwad, Susimala; Harrison, Heather; Longton, Clare; Martin, Melanie; Motion, Maureen; Voules, Sue; McDonald, Marie Therese; Jeffries, Claire
• Is Part Of: Rheumatology. Volume 61(2022)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2022-04-23
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac133.264
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-0324

Abstract

Abstract: Background/Aims: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is used in the monitoring of those living with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); it is the recommended and validated measure of movement in this patient group. As a physical outcome measure its use has been challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to assess the current application of the BASMI in axSpA services across the UK. Methods: A survey was devised to explore when the BASMI is used, by whom and the reasons for its use. The AStretch committee reviewed and re-drafted the questions. The survey was shared across multiple platforms and email professional distribution lists, and was open 2nd-12th October 2021. Results: 74 UK healthcare professionals completed the survey. It is mostly physiotherapists who undertake the BASMI (69%); some other clinicians also measure: nurses (10%), medics (9%), physiotherapy support workers (10%), healthcare support workers (2%). Confidence in performing the BASMI averaged at 3.5/5. The majority of respondents record the BASMI in the electronic record (73%); app-based solutions are developing (7%) and paper-only recording diminishing (20%). When asked about frequency, most respondents (73%) recorded "it depends", implying that the BASMI is used on an individual patient basis. Table 1 presents data with regards to why the BASMI is undertaken, scored by participant ranking, and free text responses about reasons for use. Conclusion: A large sample size was recruited for this survey, implying a good level of interest in better understanding the current application of the BASMI. It is evident clinicians use the BASMI on newly-diagnosed patients as a priority in their assessment and shared-decision making. Other aspects such as addressing poor movement and adherence to exercise are ranked highly. The reported reasons for BASMI use are varied, and its application not standardised across UK rheumatology teams. This might reflect the diverse trajectory of axSpA and the importance of seeing patients as individuals. How and why we undertake physical outcome measures is crucial for consideration as we currently consider remote versus face-to-face consult pathways for our axSpA cohort. There is enough evidence here to recommend ongoing, regular application of the BASMI in a traditional face-to-face setting. Disclosure: K. Weight: None. W.J. Gregory: Honoraria; W.G. has received speaker, conference registration and advisory board fees from Abbvie, Pfizer Novartis and UCB. H. Chambers: None. E. Clarke: Honoraria; E. C. has received speaker fees from Novartis UK. M. Daly: None. A. Davie: None. J.C. Elkins: None. S. Gaikwad: None. H. Harrison: None. C. Longton: Shareholder/stock ownership; C.L. is a shareholder in Astra Zeneca. Honoraria; C.L. has received speaker fees from Novartis. M. Martin: Honoraria; M.M. has received speaker, conference registration and advisory board fees from Abbvie, Novartis (not since 2018). Grants/research support; M.M. received grant monies from the National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society in 2017. M. Motion: None. S. Voules: None. M. McDonald: None. C. Jeffries: Honoraria; C.J. has received speaker, conference registration and advisory board fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis and UBC.