Double trouble: two cases of dual adrenal pathologies in one adrenal mass. (23rd March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chortis, Vasileios; May, Christine J H; Skordilis, Kassiani; Ayuk, John; Arlt, Wiebke; Crowley, Rachel K
• Is Part Of: Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports. (2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-03-23
• Subjects: Adult -- Female -- Male -- White -- United Kingdom; Adrenal -- Tumours and neoplasia -- Metanephrines -- Normetanephrine -- Phaeochromocytoma -- Incidentaloma -- Metastatic melanoma -- Adrenocortical adenoma -- Breast cancer -- Lymphadenopathy; Abdominal discomfort -- Deep vein thrombosis -- Skin biopsy -- CT scan -- Fine needle aspiration biopsy -- Histopathology -- Ultrasound scan -- MIBG scan -- Chromogranin A -- Immunohistochemistry -- Haematoxylin and eosin staining -- Adrenalectomy -- Chemotherapy -- Amlodipine -- Bendroflumethiazide -- Angiotensin receptor antagonists -- Doxazosin -- Alpha-blockers -- Phenoxybenzamine -- Propranolol -- Beta-blockers -- Dacarbazine -- Anastrozole; Oncology; Unique/unexpected symptoms or presentations of a disease -- March -- 2019; Endocrinology -- Periodicals; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Diabetes Mellitus; Endocrinology; Diabetes; Endocrinology; Case Reports; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.4
• DOI: 10.1530/EDM-18-0151
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-0573

Abstract

Summary: Context: Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) represent an increasingly common problem in modern endocrine practice. The diagnostic approach to AIs can be challenging and occasionally reveals surprising features. Here we describe two rare cases of complex adrenal lesions consisting of phaeochromocytomas with synchronous metastases from extra-adrenal primaries. Case descriptions: Patient 1 – a 65-year-old gentleman with a newly diagnosed malignant melanoma was found to harbour an adrenal lesion with suspicious radiographic characteristics. Percutaneous adrenal biopsy was consistent with adrenocortical adenoma. After excision of the skin melanoma and regional lymphatic metastases, he was followed up without imaging. Three years later, he presented with abdominal discomfort and enlargement of his adrenal lesion, associated with high plasma metanephrines. Adrenalectomy revealed a mixed tumour consisting of a large phaeochromocytoma with an embedded melanoma metastasis in its core. Patient 2 – a 63-year-old lady with a history of NF-1-related phaeochromocytoma 20 years ago and previous breast cancer presented with a new adrenal lesion on the contralateral side. Plasma normetanephrine was markedly elevated. Elective adrenalectomy revealed an adrenal tumour consisting of chromaffin cells intermixed with breast carcinoma cells. Conclusions: Adrenal incidentalomas require careful evaluation to exclude metastatic disease, especially in the context of a history of previous malignancy. Adrenal biopsy provides limited and potentially misleading information. Phaeochromocytomas are highly vascularised tumours that may function as a sieve, extracting and retaining irregularly shaped cancer cells, thereby yielding adrenal masses with intriguing dual pathology. Learning points: Adrenal incidentalomas require careful evaluation focused on exclusion of underlying hormone excess and malignant pathology. Adrenal biopsy can be misleading and should only be considered in select cases. Phaeochromocytomas harbouring intratumoural metastases from other, extra-adrenal primary malignancies represent rare pathological entities that highlight the complexities that can be presented by adrenal tumours.