Relationship of pericardial fat with biomarkers of inflammation and hemostasis, and cardiovascular disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Issue 2 (April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ong, Kwok-Leung; Ding, Jingzhong; McClelland, Robyn L.; Cheung, Bernard M.Y.; Criqui, Michael H.; Barter, Philip J.; Rye, Kerry-Anne; Allison, Matthew A.
• Is Part Of: Atherosclerosis. Volume 239:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 386
• Page End: 392
• Publication Date: 2015-04
• Subjects: Biomarkers -- Cardiovascular disease -- Hemostasis -- Inflammation -- Pericardial fat; Arteriosclerosis -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.136
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.033
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9150

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Pericardial fat may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by increasing circulating levels of inflammation and hemostasis biomarkers. We investigated the associations of pericardial fat with inflammation and hemostasis biomarkers, as well as incident CVD events, and whether there are any ethnic differences in these associations. Methods: We analyzed results from 6415 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who had measurements of pericardial fat volume and circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, interleukin (IL)-6, factor VIII, D-dimer and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP), and had a mean follow-up period of 9.5 years. Incident CVD event was defined as any adjudicated CVD event. Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, pericardial fat volume was positively associated with natural log (ln) of IL-6 levels, but inversely associated with ln D-dimer and ln PAP levels (β = 0.067, −0.032, and −0.105 respectively, all P < 0.05). Although a larger pericardial fat volume was associated with a higher risk of incident CVD, the association was attenuated to borderline significance after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors ( P = 0.050). There was a borderline significant ethnicity interaction ( P = 0.080), whereby the association between pericardial fat volume and incident CVD was significant in Hispanic Americans, even after further adjusting for biomarkers of inflammation and hemostasis (hazard ratio = 1.31 per SD increase, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.57, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Pericardial fat was associated with several inflammation and hemostasis biomarkers. The association of pericardial fat with incident CVD events was independent of these biomarkers only among Hispanic Americans. Highlights: Pericardial fat may be related to systemic inflammation and hemostasis. We analyzed data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Pericardial fat was associated with several inflammation and hemostasis biomarkers. Association of pericardial fat with CVD was independent of biomarkers in Hispanics.