Flexible versus rigid laryngoscopy: A randomized crossover study comparing patient experience. (6th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Flexible versus rigid laryngoscopy: A randomized crossover study comparing patient experience. (6th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Flexible versus rigid laryngoscopy: A randomized crossover study comparing patient experience
- Authors:
- Clark, Bhavishya S.
Gao, William Z.
Bertelsen, Caitlin
Choi, Janet S.
Shoffel‐Havakuk, Hagit
Reder, Lindsay S.
Hapner, Edie R.
Johns, Michael M.
O'Dell, Karla - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To compare flexible distal‐chip laryngoscopy (FDL) versus rigid telescopic laryngoscopy (RTL) in regard to examinees' pain level, comfort, satisfaction, and preference, and to evaluate the clinician's assessment of the examinees' experience with both exam types. Study Design: Randomized crossover study. Methods: Twenty‐three normal adult subjects were recruited to undergo both FDL and RTL; the initial exam type was randomized. Subjects and clinicians completed corresponding questionnaires after each exam. Differences in participant characteristics and questionnaire scores between the two exam types were assessed via Pearson χ 2 and paired t tests, respectively. Results: Overall, participants reported that FDL was more uncomfortable than RTL (4.22 vs. 2.91, P = .003) and scored higher on the pain scale for FDL compared to RTL (2.91 vs. 1.70, P = .006). However, there was no significant difference in number of participants who preferred FDL versus RTL (10 [43%] vs. 13 [57%]). Poor correlation was seen between clinicians' assessment of participants' discomfort and actual reported discomfort for FDL (2.70 vs. 4.22, P = .001). Conclusions: Subjects undergoing FDL experience greater discomfort and pain compared to RTL, but do not demonstrate a differential preference of exam. Overall, clinicians underestimate the discomfort of patients undergoing FDL, but participants maintain high satisfaction with both exams nonetheless. Level of Evidence: 1 Laryngoscope,Abstract : Objectives: To compare flexible distal‐chip laryngoscopy (FDL) versus rigid telescopic laryngoscopy (RTL) in regard to examinees' pain level, comfort, satisfaction, and preference, and to evaluate the clinician's assessment of the examinees' experience with both exam types. Study Design: Randomized crossover study. Methods: Twenty‐three normal adult subjects were recruited to undergo both FDL and RTL; the initial exam type was randomized. Subjects and clinicians completed corresponding questionnaires after each exam. Differences in participant characteristics and questionnaire scores between the two exam types were assessed via Pearson χ 2 and paired t tests, respectively. Results: Overall, participants reported that FDL was more uncomfortable than RTL (4.22 vs. 2.91, P = .003) and scored higher on the pain scale for FDL compared to RTL (2.91 vs. 1.70, P = .006). However, there was no significant difference in number of participants who preferred FDL versus RTL (10 [43%] vs. 13 [57%]). Poor correlation was seen between clinicians' assessment of participants' discomfort and actual reported discomfort for FDL (2.70 vs. 4.22, P = .001). Conclusions: Subjects undergoing FDL experience greater discomfort and pain compared to RTL, but do not demonstrate a differential preference of exam. Overall, clinicians underestimate the discomfort of patients undergoing FDL, but participants maintain high satisfaction with both exams nonetheless. Level of Evidence: 1 Laryngoscope, 130:2663–2666, 2020 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Laryngoscope. Volume 130:Number 11(2020)
- Journal:
- Laryngoscope
- Issue:
- Volume 130:Number 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 130, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 130
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0130-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2663
- Page End:
- 2666
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-06
- Subjects:
- Indirect laryngoscopy -- flexible laryngoscopy -- rigid laryngoscopy -- patient experience -- comfort -- pain -- satisfaction -- preference
Otolaryngology -- Periodicals
617.51005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1531-4995/issues ↗
http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0023-852X ↗
http://www.laryngoscope.com ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/lary.28491 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0023-852X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5156.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21824.xml