A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis on digital health interventions for people living with dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment. (19th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Di Lorito, Claudio; Bosco, Alessandro; Rai, Harleen; Craven, Michael; McNally, Donal; Todd, Chris; Booth, Vicky; Cowley, Alison; Howe, Louise; Harwood, Rowan H.
• Is Part Of: International journal of geriatric psychiatry. Volume 37:Number 6(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-05-19
• Subjects: dementia -- digital health -- effectiveness -- information technology -- literature review -- meta‐analysis -- Mild Cognitive Impairment -- rehabilitation; Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals; Geriatric Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 618.97689
• DOI: 10.1002/gps.5730
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6230

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Digital health interventions enable services to support people living with dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) remotely. This literature review gathers evidence on the effectiveness of digital health interventions on physical, cognitive, behavioural and psychological outcomes, and Activities of Daily Living in people living with dementia and MCI. Methods/Design: Searches, using nine databases, were run in November 2021. Two authors carried out study selection/appraisal using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Study characteristics were extracted through the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions data extraction form. Data on digital health interventions were extracted through the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Intervention effectiveness was determined through effect sizes. Meta‐analyses were performed to pool data on intervention effectiveness. Results: Twenty studies were included in the review, with a diverse range of interventions, modes of delivery, activities, duration, length, frequency, and intensity. Compared to controls, the interventions produced a moderate effect on cognitive abilities (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI = −0.03 to 0.76; I 2 = 61%), and a negative moderate effect on basic ADLs (SMD = −0.40; 95% CI = −0.86 to 0.05; I 2 = 69%). Stepping exergames generated the largest effect sizes on physical and cognitive abilities. Supervised training produced larger effect sizes than unsupervised interventions. Conclusion: Supervised intervention delivery is linked to greatest benefits. A mix of remote and face‐to‐face delivery could maximise benefits and optimise costs. Accessibility, acceptability and sustainability of digital interventions for end‐users must be pre‐requisites for the development of future successful services. Key points: Digital health interventions have enabled services to keep delivering health care to people living with dementia during the COVID‐19 pandemic, and while evidence on their effectiveness is mounting, an update of the literature is needed. This systematic review of the literature on digital health interventions for people living with dementia included 20 studies on a diverse range of interventions, modes of delivery, activities, duration, length, frequency, and intensity. Digital health interventions produced positive effects on cognitive abilities and negative effects on activities of daily living, compared to non‐digital interventions. Stepping exergames generated the largest effect sizes on physical and cognitive abilities, while supervised training produced larger effect sizes than unsupervised interventions.