3D Fractional Limb Volume Identifies Reduced Subcutaneous and Lean Mass in Fetal Growth Restriction. (28th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Steller, Jonathan G.; Gumina, Diane; Driver, Camille; Palmer, Claire; Brown, Laura D.; Reeves, Shane; Hobbins, John C.; Galan, Henry L.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 41:Number 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1623
• Page End: 1632
• Publication Date: 2021-09-28
• Subjects: 3D ultrasound -- fractional limb volume -- fetal growth restriction -- intrauterine growth restriction -- Ponderal index -- small for gestational age; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15841
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Fetal 2D and 3D fractional limb volume (FLV) measurements by ultrasound can detect fetal lean and subcutaneous mass and possibly percent body fat. Our objectives were to 1) compare FLV measurements in fetuses with fetal growth restriction (FGR) versus small for gestational age (SGA) defined by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)‐supported international Delphi consensus and 2) correlate FLV findings with birth metrics. We hypothesize that FLV measurements will be significantly smaller in FGR versus SGA fetuses and will correlate closer with Ponderal index (PIx) in the neonate than abdominal circumference (AC). Methods: Patients were categorized as FGR or SGA as defined by ISUOG. Total thigh volume (TTV), volumes of lean mass (LMV), and fat mass volume (FMV) were calculated from 3D acquisitions. Measurements were compared between groups and correlated with birthweight (BW) and PIx (BW/crown‐heal length). Results: The FGR group (n = 37) delivered earlier (37/2 versus 38/0; P = .0847), were lighter (2.2 kg versus 2.6 kg; P = .0003) and had lower PIx (0.023 versus 0.025; P = .0013) than SGAs (n = 22). FGRs had reduced TTV (40.6 versus 48.4 cm 3 ; P = .0164), FMV (20.8 versus 25.3 cm 3 ; P = .0413), and LMV (19.8 versus 23.1 cm 3 ; P = .0387). AC had the highest area under the curve (0.69) for FGR. FMV was more strongly associated with PIx than the AC ( P = .0032). Conclusions: The AC and FLV measurements were significantly reduced in FGR fetuses compared to SGAs. While the AC outperformed FLV in predicting FGR, the FLV correlated best with PIx, which holds investigative promise.